2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro evaluation of aligner force decay in artificial saliva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 In a study using 0.75 mm Duran T as the aligner sheet, when the sheet was expanded by 0.2 mm and immersed in artificial saliva for 1, 4, and 7 days, the residual strengths measured with a thin-film pressure sensor were 94%, 90%, and 85%, respectively. 14 In this study, when 0.75 mm Duran T aligner sheets were immersed in artificial saliva for 1, 4, and 7 days and subjected to a three-point bending test, the measured residual strengths were similar at 94%, 79%, and 74%, respectively. Although the thickness of the aligner sheets decreases after thermoplastic forming, the formed shape limits the release of residual stress, resulting in a higher rate of strength degradation in the three-point test compared to the forming aligners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“… 11 In a study using 0.75 mm Duran T as the aligner sheet, when the sheet was expanded by 0.2 mm and immersed in artificial saliva for 1, 4, and 7 days, the residual strengths measured with a thin-film pressure sensor were 94%, 90%, and 85%, respectively. 14 In this study, when 0.75 mm Duran T aligner sheets were immersed in artificial saliva for 1, 4, and 7 days and subjected to a three-point bending test, the measured residual strengths were similar at 94%, 79%, and 74%, respectively. Although the thickness of the aligner sheets decreases after thermoplastic forming, the formed shape limits the release of residual stress, resulting in a higher rate of strength degradation in the three-point test compared to the forming aligners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%