2021
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An indicator species highlights continuous deadwood supply is a key ecological attribute of boreal old‐growth forests

Abstract: An indicator species highlights continuous deadwood supply is a key ecological attribute of boreal old-growth forests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(156 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these stands are the habitat of a biodiversity indicator species, the Black-backed Woodpecker Picoides arcticus), associated with old-growth attributes. Thus, forest harvesting may threaten vertebrate species associated with old-growth forest attributes [11] but also organisms (insects, fungi, non-vascular plants) that have low-dispersal capacity and for show extinction risk increases rapidly when ecological continuity is broken [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these stands are the habitat of a biodiversity indicator species, the Black-backed Woodpecker Picoides arcticus), associated with old-growth attributes. Thus, forest harvesting may threaten vertebrate species associated with old-growth forest attributes [11] but also organisms (insects, fungi, non-vascular plants) that have low-dispersal capacity and for show extinction risk increases rapidly when ecological continuity is broken [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodpecker species are the quintessential primary cavity excavators and indicator species of forest biodiversity (Martin et al., 2021; Mikusiński et al., 2001). Species‐specific differences in preferences for tree species, nest height, and activity times make a larger diversity of woodpecker species to provide a larger number and diversity of cavities (in terms of size, shape, height, and substrate) (Nappi et al., 2015; Vergara & Schlatter, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key prerequisite to meeting this challenge is distinguishing natural forests and forests established through planting or seeding following harvest, that often exhibit profound differences in ecological and biogeochemical functions (Savilaakso et al., 2021; Vilà et al., 2013). Older, uncut boreal forests store more carbon (Fredeen et al., 2005; Jonsson et al., 2020) and harbor larger numbers of species than planted forests do (Bradshaw et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2020; Patry et al., 2017; Savilaakso et al., 2021), in part linked to larger amounts of old and large dead trees (Fridman, 2000; Martin et al., 2021; Nordén et al., 2013; Santaniello et al., 2017). In an increasingly fragmented landscape, strict protection of these old forests may greatly increase habitat connectivity (Mikusiński et al., 2021), which is also culturally and economically important, for recreation and for reindeer herding because lichens found mainly in older forests are important winter food (Sandström et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%