2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w4-435-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indoor Positioning Technique Based on a Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network Using Levenberg-Marquardt Learning Method

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This paper presents an indoor positioning technique based on a multi-layer feed-forward (MLFF) artificial neural networks (ANN). Most of the indoor received signal strength (RSS)-based WLAN positioning systems use the fingerprinting technique that can be divided into two phases: the offline (calibration) phase and the online (estimation) phase. In this paper, RSSs were collected for all references points in four directions and two periods of time (Morning and Evening). Hence, RSS readings were sampled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we know, most WLAN positioning uses a fingerprint [30] matching method, but it is highly environment dependent, while the collection of a fingerprint library is difficult. Other feed-forward neural network (FNN) positioning algorithms [31,32] need to train the network parameters in advance, which take a great deal of time and a large amount of computation. Different from the methods in [18,[26][27][28][29]32], in the non-ideal environment of measurement error of TOA without a Gaussian distribution, the performance of the Chan positioning algorithm is limited due to the large initial solution error.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we know, most WLAN positioning uses a fingerprint [30] matching method, but it is highly environment dependent, while the collection of a fingerprint library is difficult. Other feed-forward neural network (FNN) positioning algorithms [31,32] need to train the network parameters in advance, which take a great deal of time and a large amount of computation. Different from the methods in [18,[26][27][28][29]32], in the non-ideal environment of measurement error of TOA without a Gaussian distribution, the performance of the Chan positioning algorithm is limited due to the large initial solution error.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the online phase of location fingerprinting, the location of user was estimated. The average positioning error for the proposed model containing 30% check and validation data was computed approximately 2.20 m (Pahlavani et al, 2017). Zou et al (2017) proposed a WiFi-based non-intrusive indoor positioning system for automatic online radio map construction and adaptation for calibration-free indoor localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%