2014
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-2311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Inducible Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model for Preclinical Evaluation of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Adult Mice

Abstract: The limited availability of experimental tumor models that faithfully mimic the progression of human tumors and their response to therapy remains a major bottleneck to the clinical translation and application of novel therapeutic principles. To address this challenge in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the deadliest and most common cancers in the world, we developed and validated an inducible model of hepatocarcinogenesis in adult mice. Tumorigenesis was triggered by intravenous adenoviral delivery of Cr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we confirmed the specificity of sorafenib and GW3965 treatment by assessing gene expression levels of known markers of drug activity. Upregulation of GADD45B and downregulation of PDGFRB mRNA levels are indicative of sorafenib activity 22, 23 , and we observed these trends in sorafenib and combination groups. We also noted upregulation of the LXR target genes FASN and SREBF1 24, 25 in the GW3965 and combination groups, as expected (Figure 5C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Next, we confirmed the specificity of sorafenib and GW3965 treatment by assessing gene expression levels of known markers of drug activity. Upregulation of GADD45B and downregulation of PDGFRB mRNA levels are indicative of sorafenib activity 22, 23 , and we observed these trends in sorafenib and combination groups. We also noted upregulation of the LXR target genes FASN and SREBF1 24, 25 in the GW3965 and combination groups, as expected (Figure 5C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Only the expression of the pericyte marker aSMA was downregulated during regression and returned to baseline upon vessel regrowth (Mancuso et al, 2006). Persistence of pericytes along ebms after Sorafenibinduced tumor vessel regression was also observed in an inducible mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma (Runge et al, 2014). Although no changes in the pericyte coverage of remaining vessels were observed under conditions of enhanced retinal vessel regression, pericytes have recently been reported to stay attached to ebms of regressed retinal vessels (Franco et al, 2015;Korn et al, 2014;Phng et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Fate Of Pericytes During Vessel Pruning and Regressionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the results from testing on animal models may not accurately predict the result in human testing due to cross-species differences [84], causing many drugs to fail in the clinical trial stage. Furthermore, animal testing raises ethical concerns and this ethical framework is closely regulated to control the use of animals for scientific research [85].…”
Section: Angiogenesis and Tumor Vasculaturementioning
confidence: 99%