“…According to the quality criteria mentioned in the methods section, 18 studies were regarded as high-quality [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 – 30 , 36 , 37 , 43 – 46 , 51 , 53 , 57 , 61 ], 18 as moderate [ 21 , 24 , 26 , 31 , 33 – 35 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 47 – 50 , 54 , 56 , 58 – 60 ], and two studies as low-quality [ 40 , 55 ]. All RCTs described the randomization, of which 4 studies had an inappropriate random allocation method [ 39 , 40 , 50 , 54 ], and 17 studies did not provide precise information of randomization [ 24 , 26 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 44 , 45 , 55 , 56 , 58 – 60 ]. While 15 studies used allocation concealment to prevent selection bias [ 23 , 27 – 30 , 37 , ...…”