2016
DOI: 10.3390/dj4030024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ingested Orthodontic Wire Fragment: A Case Report

Abstract: Accidental ingestion or inhalation of foreign bodies has been widely documented, including incidents which occur whilst undertaking dental treatment. Most ingested objects pass through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) spontaneously, but approximately 10%–20% need to be removed endoscopically and 1% require surgery. This case reports a complication arising from the accidental loss of an archwire fragment during maxillary archwire placement. It describes the immediate and subsequent management, including the use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 14 ] (2014) report that a segment of pendulum appliance was fractured and the patient swallowed it during her breakfast.In Puryer et al's article (2016), the archwire fragment was not retained in the cutting pliers and slipped into the oropharyngeal region. [ 15 ] In Lee's case report and Milton et al’ s second patient, a segment of the wire was swallowed while eating food. [ 16 17 ] A segment of wire was also ingested in Obinata et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14 ] (2014) report that a segment of pendulum appliance was fractured and the patient swallowed it during her breakfast.In Puryer et al's article (2016), the archwire fragment was not retained in the cutting pliers and slipped into the oropharyngeal region. [ 15 ] In Lee's case report and Milton et al’ s second patient, a segment of the wire was swallowed while eating food. [ 16 17 ] A segment of wire was also ingested in Obinata et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingestion and aspiration of foreign bodies have been well documented [1] , [2] , [3] . In general, ingestion is more common than aspiration, although occurs more frequently in the pediatric population [1 , 2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingestion and aspiration of foreign bodies have been well documented [1] , [2] , [3] . In general, ingestion is more common than aspiration, although occurs more frequently in the pediatric population [1 , 2] . Usually incidents of ingestion or aspiration occur in children younger than 3 years old with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1 [1] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the item has sharp edges and/or is in a critical area, it must be removed. However approximately 60% enter the gastrointestinal tract without lodging in the oesophagus (Puryer et al, 2016). Possible complications due to unnoticed foreign body ingestion include damage to the gastric mucosa, intestinal obstruction, perforation with/without subsequent abscess formation which may be retropharyngeal or intra-abdominal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible complications due to unnoticed foreign body ingestion include damage to the gastric mucosa, intestinal obstruction, perforation with/without subsequent abscess formation which may be retropharyngeal or intra-abdominal. Other more serious consequences are sepsis, peritonitis, impacted and/or esophageal stenosis, ulcerative esophagitis, gastroesophageal, and enterocolic fistula, recurrent pneumonitis, hemorrhage, and failure on the pathway of the object elimination (Parolia et al, 2009;Obinata et al, 2011;Puryer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%