2023
DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000558.v3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An initial genomic blueprint of the healthy human oesophageal microbiome

Abstract: Background. The oesophageal microbiome is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of oesophageal cancer. However, investigations using culture and molecular barcodes have provided only a low-resolution view of this important microbial community. We therefore explored the potential of culturomics and metagenomic binning to generate a catalogue of reference genomes from the healthy human oesophageal microbiome, alongside a comparison set from saliva. Results. Twenty-two distin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our arbitrary Candidatus names have begun to be cited in research publications [7][8][9][10][11][12], but, curiously, the names cannot be validly published under the SeqCode, as the SeqCode rules explicitly exclude use of arbitrary components in the creation of names, despite over a century and a half of precedents for such practice [13] and recent adoption of arbitrary arti cial su xes in the quest to replace descriptive names for prokaryotic phyla and kingdoms with those built from type genera [14,15]. If the SeqCode community prefers not to use our arbitrary names, they should at least rise to the challenge of creating tens of thousands of new names that do meet their own arbitrary rules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our arbitrary Candidatus names have begun to be cited in research publications [7][8][9][10][11][12], but, curiously, the names cannot be validly published under the SeqCode, as the SeqCode rules explicitly exclude use of arbitrary components in the creation of names, despite over a century and a half of precedents for such practice [13] and recent adoption of arbitrary arti cial su xes in the quest to replace descriptive names for prokaryotic phyla and kingdoms with those built from type genera [14,15]. If the SeqCode community prefers not to use our arbitrary names, they should at least rise to the challenge of creating tens of thousands of new names that do meet their own arbitrary rules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%