2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative C-shaped yielding metallic dampers for steel structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the ultimate strength and stiffness of the frame can be expressed using Eqs. ( 9) and (10), where 'n' represents the number of dampers used in the frame, and denotes the ultimate stress of the damper, which is equal to 69 MPa [18]. Figs.…”
Section: Verification Of Aydmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the ultimate strength and stiffness of the frame can be expressed using Eqs. ( 9) and (10), where 'n' represents the number of dampers used in the frame, and denotes the ultimate stress of the damper, which is equal to 69 MPa [18]. Figs.…”
Section: Verification Of Aydmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, different geometries of yielding dampers have been used to strengthen concrete and steel structures. Farsi et al [10] proposed a C-Shaped Damper (CSD) for braced frame structures. The CSD dissipates earthquake energy using sacrificial C-Shaped elements, protecting main structural elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various supplementary energy dissipation devices have been detailed in the literature, and these can be distinguished based on the required mechanism for activation [5]. Depending on their responsiveness to seismic excitation, these additional energy dissipation systems can be classified as either active or semi-active systems (such as Active Bracing Systems, Active Mass Dampers, Variable Stiffness or Damping Systems, Smart Materials) or passive systems (such as Metallic Dampers, Friction Dampers, Viscoelastic Dampers, Viscous Fluid Dampers, Tuned Mass Dampers, Tuned Liquid Dampers) [3,[6][7][8][9]. These devices employ varying techniques to mitigate the impact of earthquakes on buildings [2,4,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, numerous passive energy‐dissipating devices have been proposed to improve the seismic behavior of structures. These devices can be categorized as friction dampers, 2 viscoelastic dampers, 3 and metallic yielding dampers 4 . Among existing dampers, researchers 2–5 had shown that metallic dampers are the most economical candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices can be categorized as friction dampers, 2 viscoelastic dampers, 3 and metallic yielding dampers 4 . Among existing dampers, researchers 2–5 had shown that metallic dampers are the most economical candidates. Also, metallic dampers show a stable hysteresis with significant dissipation of seismic energy especially when they are used for improving the behavior of concentrically braced frame (CBFs) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%