An Inside Sun: Lickanantay Volcanology in the Salar de Atacama

Abstract

The need of establishing more substantive dialogs between the mainstream and Indigenous knowledge on volcanoes has been increasingly recognized. To contribute to this endeavor, in this article we present the basic volcanological understandings of the Lickanantay people in the Salar de Atacama Basin. The Salar de Atacama Basin is an active volcanic territory within the Central Volcanic Zone of the Andes (CVZA). From the El Tatio geothermal field to Socompa volcano, more than 19 active volcanoes surround the territory that the Lickanantay (Atacameño) people have inhabited for more than 11,000 years. Living around and with the geological dynamism of the CVZA for millennia, the Lickanantay communities have accumulated rich observational and ceremonial data on volcanoes and volcanism. Paradoxically, however, while the Atacameño people have thoroughly characterized the CVZA, the volcanology community has not been properly introduced to the ancestral knowledge articulated in the territory. In order to make traditional Atacameño perspectives on volcanoes, volcanic risk, and geo-cosmic interdependence more amply available to the volcanology community, in this article, we present a basic description of what we call Atacameño volcanology. By Atacameño volcanology, we understand the ancestral principles by which volcanoes are known and understood as partaking in larger processes of a cosmo-ecological formation. Specifically, we describe the basic volcanological notions arising from the Lickanantay ancestral knowledge—volcanic formation, functions, and behavior. Second, we focus on the El Tatio geothermal field to offer a situated example. Finally, we delineate some relevant elements of human–volcano interactions and volcanic risk management from an Atacameño perspective. In our conclusions we suggest that volcanology, particularly in the context of the Andes, needs to engage more substantially with the Atacameño or other ancestral systems of knowledge production to expand volcanological insights and respond to the call for decolonizing science.

Intertwining volcanoes and society in Chile through arts and interdisciplinary connections

“…Relationships between cultures and volcanoes can be found in different contexts. For example, in the use of volcanic materials for the production of moai in Rapa Nui (Gioncada et al, 2010), in the integration of volcanic features in mobility networks and social dynamics in the Andean highlands (Loyola et al, 2022(Loyola et al, , 2023, in the Atacameño or Likan Antai cosmovision of the world, where volcanoes are important agents that connect the world below with the world above (Ramos Chocobar and Tironi, 2022), and are related to meteorological phenomena and ritual centers (Moyano and Uribe, 2012). Several examples of this deep connection between ancient cultures and volcanic activity and volcanic landscapes can be found in different parts of the world (e.g., Holmberg, 2007;Donovan, 2019;Ulusoy et al, 2019;Reyes-Guzmán et al, 2023).…”

The Andean Southern Volcanic Zone: a review on the legacy of the latest volcanic eruptions

“…There are social processes related to diverse understandings of inhabiting volcanic territories, such as the existing local knowledge systems about volcanic activity (Ramos and Tironi, 2022) and disaster memory on past eruptions (Petit-Breuilh, 2004, 2023Vergara-Pinto and Marín, 2023;Walshe et al, 2023), which are highly valued for people to make sense of volcanic risk. Along with this, the societyvolcano coexistence includes uncertainties regarding unpredictable eruptive scenarios for populations and scientists (Vergara-Pinto and Romero, 2023).…”

Water or mineral resource? Legal interpretations and hydrosocial configurations of lithium mining in Chile

“…This in turn entails studying the "temporal menagerie of meaning, materiality and legal structure through which water becomes known when different regimes of exploitation and extraction become attached to it at various points in history and cascade forward in time" (Vogt and Walsh, 2021, p. 1). Importantly, different water here refers not merely to different representations of water but different underlining realities of water itself, or different ontologies (Bonelli, 2017;Yates et al, 2017;Jerez et al, 2021;Linton, 2022;Ramos and Tironi, 2022). Laws, regulations and legal frameworks more in general play a significant role in the process of defining water(s) and in shaping its allocation and access.…”