An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies

Abstract

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by University of Calgary For Authors:If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comWith over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.Abstract From an extensive review of the literature in the field of total quality management (TQM), 11 constructs of TQM implementation were identified. An instrument measuring these constructs was developed. The reliability and validity of the instrument were tested and validated using data from 212 Chinese manufacturing companies. Various methods were employed for this test and validation. Comparisons between this instrument and the three other quality management instruments were made. It was concluded finally that the instrument presented in this paper was reliable and valid. Researchers will be able to use this instrument for developing quality management theory. Industrial practitioners will be able to use this instrument to evaluate their TQM implementation so as to target improvement areas.The research register for this journal is available at

The Importance of Soft Factors for Quality Improvement: Case Study of Electrical and Electronics Firms in Malaysia

“…This suggests that training and educational programs in the firms help to enhance their employee's knowledge, skills and behaviors which ultimately improve the quality of products and services. This findings support the previous empirical studies that have found training and education as a critical factor for the successful quality improvement implementation in organization (Thiagarajan and Zairi, 1997;Quazi and Padibjo, 1998;Yusof and Aspinwall, 1999;Zhang et al, 2000;Calisir et al, 2001;Dayton, 2001;Pun, 2001). Finally, reward and recognition also was found to have significant positive contributions towards quality improvement in the sampled firms.…”

Total Quality Management Practices on Employees’ Job Involvement in Nepalese Manufacturing Industry

“…Customer focus and training & education are measured by a five-item scale and ranges from (1) "strongly disagree" to (5) "strongly agree" developed by Zhang (1999). Teamwork is measured by using four-point Likert scale developed by Flynn et al (1994) and Lau and Idris (2001).…”

Role of Exploratory Factor Analysis Applicability of TQM Practices on the Items of Quality Culture in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

“…Similarly, McAdam and Kelly (2002) supported the claim by confirming that training and development are important elements in TQM activities. Moreover, Zhang et al (2000) demonstrated that firms believe that education and training form a significant part of all TQM initiatives.…”

“…Its focus is on adherence to quality and it ensures that process capability is able to bring about the production needs (Zhang et al, 2000). Similarly, Oakland (1993) revealed that process management is a process of convincing employees that they are responsible for their work in terms of customer satisfaction and Motwani (2001) contended that process management adds value to a process, maximizes each employee's productivity and enhances the quality of the firm.…”