“…The predictive models that support EWS constructions will be clustered as three main branches: the logit/probit regression model -which classic methodology pioneers the EWS construction and keeps most prevailing in the crisis prediction studies (Eichengreen et al, 1995;Frankel and Rose, 1996;Berg and Pattillo, 1999b;Bussiere and Fratzscher, 2006;Candelon et al, 2014;Dawood et al, 2017); the indicator approachwhich provides an alternative nonparametric methodology to detect the leading factors and uses the refined factors to construct the crisis indicator (Kaminsky et al, 1998;Kaminsky and Reinhart, 1999;Lestano et al, 2004;Berg et al, 2005;Coudert and Gex, 2008;Rogoff, 2011, 2013;Peng and Bajona, 2008); the state-of-art machine learning and deep learning models (Nag and Mitra, 1999;Oh et al, 2006;Celik and Karatepe, 2007;Yu et al, 2010;Yoon and Park, 2014;Chatzis et al, 2018;Beutel et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020a;Samitas et al, 2020) -which are not merely expert in modeling the data with significant non-linearity and non-normality, but barely subject to the data size as well. Comparing to the first two classic models, the stylized machine learning models generally perform best in forecasting ability, but meanwhile suffers the pain of deteriorating performance on out-of-samples as the model structure complexity is gained that leads serious over-fitting effect (Beutel et al, 2019;Holopainen and Sarlin, 2017) especially for low frequency data prediction.…”