2015
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2015.12001838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Framework of Inter-Sectorality: Nonprofitness and Its Influence on Society and Public Administration Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SEs are a relatively new type of ERG out of many types of ERG actors. SEs are private citizens who establish organizations to pursue public value using means that involve a combination of publicness, privateness and nonprofitness logics (Bozeman 2007;Bozeman and Moulton 2011;Robichau, Fernandez, and Kraeger 2015;Teasdale and Dey 2019). Publicness refers to the extent in which an organization pursues public interest (e.g., creating public goods) and is shaped by political forces (Jorgensen and Bozeman 2007).…”
Section: Social Enterprises and Emergent Response Groups In Post-disamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SEs are a relatively new type of ERG out of many types of ERG actors. SEs are private citizens who establish organizations to pursue public value using means that involve a combination of publicness, privateness and nonprofitness logics (Bozeman 2007;Bozeman and Moulton 2011;Robichau, Fernandez, and Kraeger 2015;Teasdale and Dey 2019). Publicness refers to the extent in which an organization pursues public interest (e.g., creating public goods) and is shaped by political forces (Jorgensen and Bozeman 2007).…”
Section: Social Enterprises and Emergent Response Groups In Post-disamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Privateness refers to the extent an organization has self-interest (e.g., pursuing profit, industriousness, thriftiness) and is influenced by market forces (Bozeman and Moulton 2011). Nonprofitness refers to the extent an organization has voluntary engagement and non-profit interest and is influenced by moral forces (Robichau, Fernandez, and Kraeger 2015).…”
Section: Social Enterprises and Emergent Response Groups In Post-disamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greenwood and Eggins quote Rhodes (1991: 533) in noting that the ‘real world of public administration has undergone a variety of upheavals…privatisation, the “new public management”, and cutbacks in public expenditure and public sector employment’. New Public Management, moreover, was both a cause and consequence of governments adopting greater market orientations and privatising ownership and provision of services to the private and non-profit sectors (Hajnal, 2015: 96; Robichau et al, 2015: 316). This has led to a blending of practices and norms, with government departments often adopting aspects of the institutional and work logics of the private sector (Knutsen, 2012; Oesch, 2006; Robichau et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Engagement Agenda In the Teaching Of Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories of publicness, privateness, and nonprofitness fit well with the literature on hybridization and sector blurring because there has been increased recognition of the changing relationships between the sectors in the past two decades. Scholars have noted a growing penchant among corporations to emulate the moral functions and values of nonprofits (Robichau et al 2015); however, there remain questions about how much public benefit a for-profit organization can or should pursue.Scholars have noted a growing penchant among corporations to emulate the moral functions and values of nonprofits (Robichau et al 2015); however, there remain questions about how much public benefit a for-profit organization can or should pursue.…”
Section: Organized Interests and Public Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%