2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weinstein and Chung [22] studied the integration of production and maintenance decisions in a hierarchical planning environment, and evaluated an organization's maintenance policy using a three-part model, where an aggregate planning model was described using a mixed-integer linear programming in stage one, a master production scheduling model was proposed to minimize the weighted deviations from the goals given at the aggregate level in stage two, and the master production schedule and the maintenance plan were simulated in stage three, which is the only stage studying the system failures. Their work was further researched by Aghezzaf et al [1], which considered the reliability parameters of the production system at the early stage of the planning process, and developed a multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem based on a system that was subjected to random failures, to minimize the expected total costs of production and maintenance. This work was extended by Aghezzaf and Najid [2], which discussed the issue of integrating production planning and PM in a production system composed of parallel failure-prone production lines.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weinstein and Chung [22] studied the integration of production and maintenance decisions in a hierarchical planning environment, and evaluated an organization's maintenance policy using a three-part model, where an aggregate planning model was described using a mixed-integer linear programming in stage one, a master production scheduling model was proposed to minimize the weighted deviations from the goals given at the aggregate level in stage two, and the master production schedule and the maintenance plan were simulated in stage three, which is the only stage studying the system failures. Their work was further researched by Aghezzaf et al [1], which considered the reliability parameters of the production system at the early stage of the planning process, and developed a multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem based on a system that was subjected to random failures, to minimize the expected total costs of production and maintenance. This work was extended by Aghezzaf and Najid [2], which discussed the issue of integrating production planning and PM in a production system composed of parallel failure-prone production lines.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defects of the system arrive independently according to (1) an HPP. The delay-time of all defects is independent and identically (2) distributed.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the two papers that are most closely related to the problem treated in this paper has been presented by Aghezzaf et al (2007) who study different versions of dynamic lotsizing models in which the objective function is augmented by a term dealing with the cost of preventive and corrective maintenance based on a probabilistic failure rate function for the case of cyclic preventive maintenance activities. The other closely related paper was presented by Jacobs et al (2009).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also proposed strategies and developed models to integrate the production and maintenance planning decisions both at the tactical as well as at the operational levels. Various mathematical models focusing on coordinating production and maintenance plans are proposed in (Lin et al, 1992;Gurevich et al, 1996;Agogino et al, 1997;Ben-Daya and Rahim, 2000;El-Amin et al, 2000;Kiyoshi et al, 2002;Chattopadhyay, 2004;Martorell et al, 2005;Aghezzaf et al, 2007;Dahal and Chakpitak, 2007;El-Ferik, 2008;Fitouhi and Nourelfath, 2012;Wang, 2013). A wide variety of solution techniques and algorithms including the whole spectrum of heuristic techniques, dynamic programming, tabusearch multi-objective optimization, expert systems and many other hybrid techniques are also proposed, see for example (Lin et al, 1992;Gurevich et al, 1996;Agogino et al, 1997;Ben-Daya and Rahim, 2000;Kiyoshi et al, 2002;Chattopadhyay, 2004;Martorell et al, 2005;Dahal and Chakpitak, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%