22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Study of Laminar Separation Bubble Effect on Tonal Noise Generation in Transitional Airfoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless as long as the mean pressure coefficient is at least reasonably reproduced in the aft part of the aerofoil, the trailing-edge noise sources are comparable. For these reasons, the mean measured pressure coefficient for the SD7003 aerofoil has been compared with that predicted by two-dimensional Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) numerical simulations [25], following the methodology proposed in [29]. In particular the computational domain includes the nozzle.…”
Section: Aerofoil Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless as long as the mean pressure coefficient is at least reasonably reproduced in the aft part of the aerofoil, the trailing-edge noise sources are comparable. For these reasons, the mean measured pressure coefficient for the SD7003 aerofoil has been compared with that predicted by two-dimensional Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) numerical simulations [25], following the methodology proposed in [29]. In particular the computational domain includes the nozzle.…”
Section: Aerofoil Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is aimed at completing the knowledge about tonal trailing-edge noise with experimental, analytical, and numerical investigations. The experimental study and the analytical modeling have been carried out at ECL [24,25] and the numerical simulations performed at ERAU [26][27][28]. Two aerofoils have been selected, namely the symmetric NACA-0012 aerofoil and a slightly cambered SD7003 aerofoil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5 Such a tonal noise has been observed within the context of several different applications, including UAVs and low-speed fans. It has been intensively studied on the symmetric NACA0012 airfoil at low to transitional Reynolds numbers since the 1970s 11 and has received renewed interest with improved measurement techniques [12][13][14][15] and with direct numerical simulations (DNS). [16][17][18][19] Yet no consensus has been reached on the aeroacoustic/hydrodynamic feedback mechanisms 20 which may involve upstream propagating acoustic waves and hydrodynamic influence of recirculation bubbles on the airfoil 14 and wake turbulent structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Liu and Chen [33] have illustrated that a porous permeable structure located in the middle of the model will generate a cavity tonal component under symmetrical flow conditions, which can also explain the better noise reduction in L00M00N06 at a zero angle of attack. On the other hand, Yakhina et al [24] have revealed that the laminar separation bubble starts earlier on the suction side and moves downstream on the pressure side with an increasing angle of attack. Therefore, the airflow passing through pores that are distributed in the upstream subregion will have an earlier impact on the boundary layer regime and then suppress laminar instability tonal noise, which can explain the better performance of L06M00N00 at α = 10 • .…”
Section: Effect Of the Pore Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is agreed that a laminar separation area on either the pressure side or the suction side of the airfoil trailing edge is a necessary condition for the generation of strong tonal noise resulting from instability [19][20][21]. Moreover, it is found that the state of the boundary layer flow (laminar or turbulent) close to the airfoil trailing edge is significantly dependent on both model parameters (such as chord length and airfoil camber) and flow parameters (free-stream velocity and angle of attack) [22][23][24]. Therefore, the aforementioned sensitivity of the airfoil tonal noise stems from the complex nature of the laminar separation in the trailing edge boundary layer.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Baseline Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 99%