2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated view of data quality in Earth observation

Abstract: Data quality is a difficult notion to define precisely, and different communities have different views and understandings of the subject. This causes confusion, a lack of harmonization of data across communities and omission of vital quality information. For some existing data infrastructures, data quality standards cannot address the problem adequately and cannot fulfil all user needs or cover all concepts of data quality. In this study, we discuss some philosophical issues on data quality. We identify actual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overlap arose because several authors first used frequentist non-spatial approaches to identify the significant covariates [54,60,65,66,7096] and then applied these covariates in a Bayesian geostatistical model [2,4,95,97112]. Two papers (3%) quantified the uncertainty arising due to questionnaires data, as well as the uncertainty arising due to combining age-groups in the predictions [71,101].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This overlap arose because several authors first used frequentist non-spatial approaches to identify the significant covariates [54,60,65,66,7096] and then applied these covariates in a Bayesian geostatistical model [2,4,95,97112]. Two papers (3%) quantified the uncertainty arising due to questionnaires data, as well as the uncertainty arising due to combining age-groups in the predictions [71,101].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data quality refers to the evaluation in terms of fitness-for-use for a given application [11]. This evaluation addresses the completeness, logical consistency, time, attribute and positional accuracy of spatial data [5760]. Different measurements of the same variable may even have different qualities according to the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the instrument or measurement technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image metadata was set according to [30,31], including tags and fields proposed by the European Prestandard (1997,1998) and the Open Geospatial Consortium. In addition, careful attention was given to properly documenting image metadata complying with ISO standards (19115, 19115-2, 19139 and 19139-2).…”
Section: Image Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different communities have different views and understandings of the subject, which causes confusion, a lack of harmonization of data across communities and omission of vital quality information [2,8]. In some of the literature data quality is defined as features and characteristics of data that bear on its ability to meet the needs and requirements of the user [9].…”
Section: It Is All About Quality!mentioning
confidence: 99%