An Interactive Approach for Specifying OWL-S Groundings

Gannod, Gerald C.; Brodie, Raynette J.; Timm, John T. E.

doi:10.1109/edoc.2005.7

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 4 shows LogoCAD, ePlan5 and many other tools admit specific services to import and export internal data which could be semantically described by OWL and which can be used in the sense of groundings (c.f. [6]). Thus each port domain should contain the semantic scheme of the service and links to services provided by the above mentioned tools.…”

Section: Model Of Holistic Mechatronic Objectmentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Specification of Holistic Mechatronic Objects Based on Semantic Web Technology

Schmidtmann

Cölln

Kreutz

et al. 2006

2006 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In general, mechanic, electronic and software are developed independently by different design tools for the same mechatronic object (MO). As a consequence, it's difficult to find links between interrelated data which are needed by back-end tools like simulators. Even new concepts based on the idea of mechatronic objects are restricted to particular views of fabrication. Different views generate different descriptions and semantics of MO. This paper proposes to define MO in a holistic manner by the language for the Semantic Web, OWL (Ontology WEB Language) such that each specific view of holistic mechatronic objects (HMO) can use a common knowledge base. This approach could be compared with the database approach where each application has its own view of the database. Furthermore, HMO concept also supports the plug-and-play philosophy.

show abstract

Section: Model Of Holistic Mechatronic Objectmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Drive itself is built upon the HMO U2 and M1 which represent the frequency converter U2 and the Motor M1 and so on. Gamnod et al [6] have developed a tool that transforms UML models of ontologies to OWL. So the user can focus more on top-level structure and semantics than on programming in OWL.…”

Section: Model Of Holistic Mechatronic Objectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specification of Holistic Mechatronic Objects Based on Semantic Web Technology

Schmidtmann

Cölln

Kreutz

et al. 2006

2006 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second stage of the framework involves a tool that we have developed to automate the process of mapping concepts in the OWL-S description to concepts in the WSDL file of a concrete service realization (Gannod, Brodie, & Timm, 2005). This tool uses the profile and process model portions of the OWL-S description and a set of WSDL files for corresponding services to automatically generate the OWL-S grounding portion of the OWL-S description.…”

Section: Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Facilitating the Specification of Semantic Web Services Using Model-Driven Development

Gannod

Timm

Brodie

2006

International Journal of Web Services Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Semantic Web promises automated invocation, discovery, and composition of Web services by enhancing services with semantic descriptions. An upper ontology for Web services called OWLS has been created to provide a mechanism for describing service semantics in a standard, well-defined manner. Unfortunately, the learning curve for semantic-rich description languages such as OWLS can be steep, especially given the current state of tool support for the language. This paper describes a suite of automated software tools that we have developed to facilitate the construction of OWLS specifications. The tools operate in two stages. In the first stage, a model-driven architecture technique is used to generate an OWLS description of a Web service from a Unified Modeling Language (UML) model. This allows the developer to focus on creating a model of the Web service in a standard UML tool, leveraging existing knowledge. In the second stage, an interactive approach for generating groundings is used. This paper describes both tools and demonstrates how the use of lightweight interactive tools facilitates creation of OWLS specifications.

show abstract

“…This mapping allows for the analysis of process models, such as simulation, reachability analysis and deadlock detection. Concerning the implementation of OWL-S specifications, Gannod et al, (2005) present an approach and tool to facilitate the generation of OWL-S groundings, i.e., mappings of service operations and processes to concrete and executable realisations, e.g., in BPEL and WSDL. A model transformation from (parts of) OWL-S to BPEL is reported in Bordbar et al (2007). At the platform specific level several integrated tools are available for specifying and simulating BPEL processes.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model-driven design, simulation and implementation of service compositions in COSMO

Quartel

Dirgahayu

Sinderen

2009

IJBPIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The success of software development projects to a large extent depends on the quality of the models that are produced in the development process, which in turn depends on the conceptual and practical support that is available for modelling, design and analysis. This paper focuses on model-driven support for service-oriented software development. In particular, it addresses how services and compositions of services can be designed, simulated and implemented. The support presented is part of a larger framework, called COSMO (COnceptual Service MOdelling). Whereas in previous work we reported on the conceptual support provided by COSMO, in this paper we proceed with a discussion of the practical support that has been developed. We show how reference models (model types) and guidelines (design steps) can be iteratively applied to design service compositions at a platform independent level and discuss what tool support is available for the design and analysis during this phase. Next, we present some techniques to transform a platform independent service composition model to an implementation in terms of BPEL and WSDL. We use the mediation scenario of the SWS challenge (concerning the establishment of a purchase order between two companies) to illustrate our application of the COSMO framework.Keywords: service composition, service modelling, service design, model-driven design, COSMO, conceptual framework, simulation, BPEL transformation Teduh Dirgahayu is a PhD candidate in Computer Science at the University of Twente (UT), The Netherlands. He holds an MSc in Telematics from the UT. His research interests include design methods, architectures for distributed systems, business process modelling, service-oriented computing and model-driven engineering. His PhD research is focused on the interaction design of service compositions, from business interaction specifications at higher abstraction levels down to executable implementations. It includes the development of a transformation tool to transform a specification at an implementation level to an executable implementation in BPEL. He participated in the Freeband/A-MUSE project (BSIK 03025). model-driven design and enterprise interoperability. He was a Project Manager of the Dutch Freeband/A-MUSE project (BSIK 03025) on model-driven design of context-aware services and currently leads the Dutch GenCom/U-Care project (IGC0816) on tailorable and adaptive homecare services.

show abstract

An Interactive Approach for Specifying OWL-S Groundings

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

Specification of Holistic Mechatronic Objects Based on Semantic Web Technology

Specification of Holistic Mechatronic Objects Based on Semantic Web Technology

Facilitating the Specification of Semantic Web Services Using Model-Driven Development

Model-driven design, simulation and implementation of service compositions in COSMO

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About