2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1719-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interactive approach to stochastic programming-based portfolio optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it calls for the development of stochastic Pareto efficiency concepts discussed above. In contrast, in some of the existing stochastic multiobjective optimization models, summary statistics such as expected value, CVaR or variance are used as the multiple criteria (see, for example, Köksalan and Şakar, 2014, for a stochastic portfolio optimization problem with three criteria: expected return, CVaR and a liquidity measure). Using these summary statistics, the resulting problem becomes a deterministic multicriteria optimization problem for which the well-defined deterministic Pareto optimality concepts can be applied.…”
Section: Coherence and Stochastic Pareto Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it calls for the development of stochastic Pareto efficiency concepts discussed above. In contrast, in some of the existing stochastic multiobjective optimization models, summary statistics such as expected value, CVaR or variance are used as the multiple criteria (see, for example, Köksalan and Şakar, 2014, for a stochastic portfolio optimization problem with three criteria: expected return, CVaR and a liquidity measure). Using these summary statistics, the resulting problem becomes a deterministic multicriteria optimization problem for which the well-defined deterministic Pareto optimality concepts can be applied.…”
Section: Coherence and Stochastic Pareto Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method of obtaining Pareto optimal solutions is to scalarize these multiple criteria using a single weight vector in the scalarization set C. By heuristically searching over C, multiple solutions in the deterministic efficient frontier are generated, and then an interactive method is employed for the decision makers to choose among these solutions. To illustrate this approach, consider a modification of the portfolio optimization problem in Köksalan and Şakar (2014) where G 1 (z) is the uncertain return of the portfolio and G 2 (z) is a random liquidity measure. Suppose that two criteria are considered:…”
Section: Coherence and Stochastic Pareto Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to know that liabilities shall not be risked in any case, or whether a certain small probability of risking them is acceptable. In the second case, it is possible to apply downside risk measures (Pla-Santamaria and Bravo 2013) such as the value-at-risk (VaR) or the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) (Köksalan and Tuncer Sakar 2014;Krzemienowski and Szymczyk 2014). Below we summarize the main features of both downside risk measures:…”
Section: Risk Profiling In Behavioral Portfolio Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed-form solutions are only presented with the assumption of independence by Li and Ng (2000), Zhu et al (2004), Yan et al (2009Yan et al ( , 2012, Yu et al (2010Yu et al ( , 2012, Wu and Li (2012), Li and Li (2012). For more general models, the solution is frequently determined by a numerical procedure (see e.g., van Binsbergen and Brandt, 2007;Mansini et al, 2007;Gülpınar and Rustem, 2007;Zhang et al, 2012Liu et al, 2012Liu et al, , 2013Köksalan and Şakar, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%