In the last 10 years, a tremendous progress characterized flow cytometry in its different aspects. In particular, major advances have been conducted regarding the hardware/ instrumentation and reagent development, thus allowing fine cell analysis up to 20 parameters. As a result, this technology generates very complex datasets that demand for the development of optimal tools of analysis. Recently, many independent research groups approached the problem by using both supervised and unsupervised methods. In this article, we will review the new developments concerning the use of bioinformatics for polychromatic flow cytometry and propose what should be done to unravel the enormous heterogeneity of the cells we interrogate each day. Published 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. DIFFERENTLY to any other tissue in the body, cells being part of the immune system display a huge diversity and hundreds of subsets can be identified even within the same lineage, such as in CD41 and CD81 T cells or in dendritic cells. Identification of the heterogeneity of the immune system components can be only achieved through flow cytometry that allows the analysis of multiple surface and intracellular markers at the level of single cell. Major contributions in the last 10-15 years on the field of instrumentation, reagent development, and software analysis tools advanced the field of cell research forward-leading to the identification of specific subsets of cells with unique biological functions in normal and pathological conditions. The Herzenberg laboratory at Stanford University developed the first instrument able to detect 11 antigens in the same cell (1); this technology was later extended in the ImmunoTechnology Section at the Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the NIH by utilizing quantum dots conjugated to monoclonal antibodies, upgraded instrumentation and allowed measurements up to 18 colors (2).Meanwhile, development of new flow cytometric assays, in primis the capability to measure the release of cytokines by stimulated immune cells (3), and the analysis of the phosphorylation state of proteins involved in signal transduction (4), moved attention from basic phenotyping to more complex cell functions. All these aspects together undoubtedly revealed multiple aspects of immune cell biology but, as a consequence, generate large and complex datasets. These data are best analyzed with the use of bioinformatic tools. Theoretically, millions of possible subpopulations can be identified in a single sample stained with 18 reagents; the number of variables measured can be increased by the different markers used in the analysis, by the experimental conditions (e.g., stimulation time, concentration of the stimulus) or by the time points in an in vitro experiment or in a clinical trial. For example, more detailed analysis of generated datasets through the use of Bayesian networks revealed the existence of intracellular pathways not previously identified through classical biochemical approaches (5). Such large datasets can be certainly analyzed by ...