2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-019-00621-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intercomparison of radiation partitioning models in vineyard canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial techniques are needed to accurately quantify ET for improved irrigation scheduling and water management decision support, particularly in complex canopies such as vineyards, which have non-uniform and complex vertical canopy structure, wide and variable row spacing, and deep and complex rooting systems [ 9 ]. This canopy structure produces large diurnal changes in solar radiation exposure to soil and plants [ 9 ] and requires sophisticated radiation extinction modeling [ 10 , 11 ]. Meanwhile, row spacing ranges between 2.4 m and 3.6 m for vineyards [ 12 ], and between 3.6 m and 6 m for orchards trees [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial techniques are needed to accurately quantify ET for improved irrigation scheduling and water management decision support, particularly in complex canopies such as vineyards, which have non-uniform and complex vertical canopy structure, wide and variable row spacing, and deep and complex rooting systems [ 9 ]. This canopy structure produces large diurnal changes in solar radiation exposure to soil and plants [ 9 ] and requires sophisticated radiation extinction modeling [ 10 , 11 ]. Meanwhile, row spacing ranges between 2.4 m and 3.6 m for vineyards [ 12 ], and between 3.6 m and 6 m for orchards trees [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…METRIC is very clearly performing better in woody crops, while ESVEP obtains better results for H in herbaceous crops and better results for λE in woody crops. It is also worth noting that R n and G showed larger relative errors in woody crops than in herbaceous crops, since woody canopies are more complex and therefore more difficult to capture by the models and/or parametrizations used [89,90]. Finally, Table 7 lists the model performance depending on whether sites are under Mediterranean and semi-arid climate (i.e., water limited sites), or sites under temperate climate (i.e., energy limited sites).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to evaluate this without direct observations. More complex and/or three-dimensional RTM methods, such as those discussed in Parry et al ( 2019 ) for vineyards, may enlighten and provide an indicator of the available energy transmitted through the canopies. The CC removal likely affected the amount of water retained in the soil, causing higher soil temperatures and changes to the thermal diffusivity of soils inducing more heat conduction (Li et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%