2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-1-2020-667-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interdisciplinary Approach for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Historical Centres in Masonry Building Aggregates: Application to the City of Scarperia, Italy

Abstract: Abstract. The seismic vulnerability of masonry building aggregates is very difficult to determine, since it is affected by many uncertainties. The most uncertain quantities concern the historical periodization of structural aggregates. Moreover, the studies made at the urban scale can hardly be thorough, and usually the knowledge achieved on the single units is not fully satisfactory, so that the structural designer has to deal with uncompleted architectonical surveys and partial data; one of the most importan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of risk assessment in GIS was implemented for the data management of expected seismic scenario analysing a building complex in Lisbona (Ilic, Bento, & Cattari, 2020). Other case studies to assess and manage the seismic damages and vulnerability in GIS were adopted for Scarperia (Cardinali et al, 2020) or to monitor the recovery plan after earthquake in L'Aquila (Contreras Blaschke, Tiede, & Jilge, 2016).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of risk assessment in GIS was implemented for the data management of expected seismic scenario analysing a building complex in Lisbona (Ilic, Bento, & Cattari, 2020). Other case studies to assess and manage the seismic damages and vulnerability in GIS were adopted for Scarperia (Cardinali et al, 2020) or to monitor the recovery plan after earthquake in L'Aquila (Contreras Blaschke, Tiede, & Jilge, 2016).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%