2003
DOI: 10.1080/00908320390154583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An International Perspective on Sunken State Vessels as Underwater Cultural Heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perth had experienced very little legal or regulatory protection in the decades it had spent underwater. As an Australian warship that had not been captured, expressly abandoned, or surrendered, Perth was—despite the ambiguous legal status of sunken state-owned vessels (Forrest 2003 )—generally assumed to be the property of the Australian government. Had it sunk in Australian territorial waters, Perth could have been declared a historic shipwreck with an associated protected zone just as its sister ship, HMAS Sydney (II), had been upon discovery in 2008 (Mearns 2009 ).…”
Section: Slow Steps Toward Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perth had experienced very little legal or regulatory protection in the decades it had spent underwater. As an Australian warship that had not been captured, expressly abandoned, or surrendered, Perth was—despite the ambiguous legal status of sunken state-owned vessels (Forrest 2003 )—generally assumed to be the property of the Australian government. Had it sunk in Australian territorial waters, Perth could have been declared a historic shipwreck with an associated protected zone just as its sister ship, HMAS Sydney (II), had been upon discovery in 2008 (Mearns 2009 ).…”
Section: Slow Steps Toward Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of sunken military vessels within territorial seas raises a complex legal issue that revolves around uncertainties regarding their status as warships and their engagement in military operations during their sinking. Moreover, the differing interpretations of international law by flag and coastal states add further complexity to this matter [19]. To gain a thorough comprehension of the sovereignty rights of flag and coastal states, it is crucial to examine the legal entitlements of state vessels, particularly warships, within the framework of international law, encompassing aspects such as ocean division and boundary status.…”
Section: Legal Status and Immunity Of Sunken Military Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While sunken warships are still considered property, they no longer fall under the command of a duly commissioned officer and are unable to navigate. Consequently, some argue that they may not be classified as "warships" and are thus no longer subject to the international regime [19,22]. As a result, the legal status of sunken military vessels remains uncertain, leading to ongoing discussions and disagreements.…”
Section: Legal Status and Immunity Of Sunken Military Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, the provisions of the current Regulations are neither conducive to preserving underwater cultural heritage, nor can they promote the orderly development of Sino-foreign cooperation, and are urgently needed to be perfected. In addition, for now, researches on the legal protection of underwater cultural heritage by Chinese scholars mostly focus on discussion on general principles such as ownership or 'in situ conservation', and largely ignoring specific provisions (Forrest, 2003).…”
Section: Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%