2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interpretation of the kinetics of martensitic transformation in a Ni45Co5Mn36.5In13.5 alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have measured C for one of the studied Ni-Mn-In samples (sample D) by using a modulated differential scanning calorimeter (Q-2000) from TA instruments. Results are in good agreement with those reported for other magnetic shape memory alloys [28,38,19,39]. We have combined these data with the entropy vs. temperature curves obtained at different values of hydrostatic pressure and magnetic field to compute the pressure induced and magnetic field induced adiabatic temperature changes shown in figure 7.…”
Section: Adiabatic Temperature Changessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have measured C for one of the studied Ni-Mn-In samples (sample D) by using a modulated differential scanning calorimeter (Q-2000) from TA instruments. Results are in good agreement with those reported for other magnetic shape memory alloys [28,38,19,39]. We have combined these data with the entropy vs. temperature curves obtained at different values of hydrostatic pressure and magnetic field to compute the pressure induced and magnetic field induced adiabatic temperature changes shown in figure 7.…”
Section: Adiabatic Temperature Changessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this case a good approximation is to assume that beyond the transition region C can be considered to be independent from the external field [38]. Furthermore, for magnetic shape memory alloys, the specific heat in both martensite and austenite does not significantly depend on composition [38,19,39]. We have measured C for one of the studied Ni-Mn-In samples (sample D) by using a modulated differential scanning calorimeter (Q-2000) from TA instruments.…”
Section: Adiabatic Temperature Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, experiments on Ni 45 Co 5 Mn 36.5 In 13.5 suggests that no collapse in the entropy difference between austenite and martensite can be observed above 0K [46]. Unfortunately, the entropy calculations presented in [46] compare thermodynamically inequivalent heat capacity measurements between super spin glass martensite under 0T and ferromagnetic austenite under 3T. The magnetic contribution to the austenite and martensite entropies is significant and care must be taken when calculating equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, based on the nucleation model [124], Fukuda et al have shown that their experimental observations of time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams can be well explained [125]. Recently, our group also proposed the use of a model based on Seeger's model [126,127].…”
Section: Kinetics Of Ni-mn-based Magnetic Shape Memory Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%