Background
Pneumonia is common in nursing home residents and is a leading cause of hospitalization and death. Nursing home residents with cerebrovascular diseases and impaired consciousness are at high risk of aspiration pneumonia. Professional and mechanical oral care by dentists and hygienists in addition to daily oral care by caregivers was shown to be effective in preventing pneumonia in nursing home residents. However, professional and mechanical oral care has not been widely provided in Japan, while daily oral care by caregivers has been widely provided as a basic service in nursing homes. This study aimed to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of providing professional and mechanical oral care for preventing pneumonia in nursing home residents.
Methods
Using a decision tree and Markov modeling, we conducted a cost‐effectiveness analysis from the payer's perspective (social insurers and patients) in Japan.
Results
The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio for professional and mechanical oral care compared with daily oral care only was calculated as 4,079,313 Japanese yen (¥; 33,994 United States dollars [US$], US$1 = ¥120) per quality‐adjusted life year.
Conclusions
Using the official value of social willingness to pay for a one‐quality‐adjusted life year gain in Japan of ¥5 million (US$41,667) as the threshold to judge cost‐effectiveness, providing professional and mechanical oral care is cost‐effective. Our results suggest professional and mechanical oral care for preventing pneumonia in nursing home residents could be justifiable as efficient use of finite healthcare resources. The results have implications for oral care in nursing homes both in Japan and worldwide.