2007
DOI: 10.1080/09544820600963412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behaviour of design engineers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Maher and Poon (1996) argue that the problem definition process in design is variable and will change in response to the current solution-seeking behavior. Coley, Houseman, and Roy (2007) suggest that design problem-solving behavior is a core and measurable cognitive indictor within the design process (Coley et al, 2007). Such ideas are implicit in the theory of a co-evolutionary process for explorative design which, arguably, results in creative products or outcomes.…”
Section: Three Cognitive Perspectives Of Parametric Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Maher and Poon (1996) argue that the problem definition process in design is variable and will change in response to the current solution-seeking behavior. Coley, Houseman, and Roy (2007) suggest that design problem-solving behavior is a core and measurable cognitive indictor within the design process (Coley et al, 2007). Such ideas are implicit in the theory of a co-evolutionary process for explorative design which, arguably, results in creative products or outcomes.…”
Section: Three Cognitive Perspectives Of Parametric Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as Coley et al [14] reported, the think-aloud method may result in interference. For example, some thoughts cannot be verbalised without causing a distortion in thinking.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Current Methodologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The main difference between novices and experts is that the latter pay frequent attention to the reformulation of the problem (Coley et al, 2007), something which is completely ignored by the novices (Brand-Gruwel et al, 2005), who prefer a pattern of trial and error (Ahmed et al, 2003) although using similar working backward strategies (Ho, 2001). This suggests that the results in an industrial contest will likely differ in absolute terms from what observed in the artificial scenario, although in relative terms the difference between the usage of the two approaches might not be particularly evident.…”
Section: Significance Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%