2015
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00841-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation into Laboratory Misidentification of a Bloodstream Klebsiellavariicola Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variicola is a nitrogen-fixing bacterium that was first identified in 2004 based on phylogenetic analysis of the rpoB gene sequence and DNA-DNA hybridization. It is estimated that 2.5% to 10% of K. pneumoniae isolates are actual misidentifications of K. variicola (1)(2)(3)(4). K. variicola is likely under-recognized because of its similar phylogenetic and biochemical properties to those of K. pneumoniae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…variicola is a nitrogen-fixing bacterium that was first identified in 2004 based on phylogenetic analysis of the rpoB gene sequence and DNA-DNA hybridization. It is estimated that 2.5% to 10% of K. pneumoniae isolates are actual misidentifications of K. variicola (1)(2)(3)(4). K. variicola is likely under-recognized because of its similar phylogenetic and biochemical properties to those of K. pneumoniae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variicola in the database and the isolate was misidentified as K. pneumoniae. The microbiology laboratory personnel suggested that we explore the possibility that our isolate was K. variicola based on a recent report by Berry et al on the misidentification of K. pneumoniae (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a reliable ID may have been compromised by the quality of the specimen or due to the few differences in the proteomic profiles within each group in those cases where no spectral profile or no reliable ID was attained. Lastly, as noted in previous studies, the discrepancies observed in multiple blood culture samples (BC04, BC157, BC160, and BC192) were probably due to the MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek inability to differentiate between K. pneumoniae and K. variicola due to similar biochemical and proteomic profiles (17,22,23). With regard to the BC-GN, it seems more likely that this assay does not misidentify K. variicola isolates and correctly reports them as not identified since the BC-GN K. pneumoniae probe has a low enough sequence identity with K. variicola (88% versus 100% for K. pneumoniae) to select against K. variicola as a target (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the case of the K. pneumoniae complex, MALDI-TOF MS identification remains largely unsatisfactory given the absence of well characterized, representative members of the complex in spectral databases. Currently, only K. pneumoniae and K. variicola are included in the Bruker database (https://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upload/1-Products/Separations_MassSpectrometry/MALDI_Biotyper/US_CA_System/MBT_list_of_organisms10_2017.pdf), and identification of even these two species is imprecise given the lack of reference spectra of other phylogroups (13, 19). To address this important limitation of currently MALDI-TOF MS technology, we used a collection of well characterized reference strains from the six K. pneumoniae complex phylogroups and analyzed them by MALDI-TOF MS in order to define the potential of this method to identify species within the K. pneumoniae complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%