An investigation into the role played by research assessment in the socio-geographic fragmentation of undergraduate economics education in the UK

Abstract

This study charts the socio-geographic fragmentation of the economics discipline in the UK. It is revealed that the marriage of economics teaching and research is now limited to elite institutions located mainly in the south of the UK. None of the UK's new (post-1992) universities submitted to the Economics and Econometrics (E&E) unit of assessment (UOA) in 2014, the UK's most recent research evaluation exercise (REE). Lower REE scores are shown to be associated with higher withdrawal rates from the next E&E UOA and subsequent undergraduate economics programme closure. Universities that exit the E&E UOA moving to the Business and Management (B&M) UOA appear to benefit in the form of higher REE scores. Though restricted to the experience of one academic discipline in one country, the lessons from this study yield important insights into how the results of REEs can be a principal driver of change in higher education.

National Research Assessment Frameworks, Publication Output Targets and Research Practices: The Compliance-Habitus Effect

“…Many nations have adopted research assessment models as a way of ranking the research performance of individual universities, often in connection with some allocation of performance-based research funding (see e.g. Wright et al, 2014;Schulze-Cleven and Olson, 2017;Johnston and Reeves, 2018). In some nations, performance-based academic workload models are also common for individual academics whose workloads comprise some combination of teaching, research and administration or service (Vardi, 2009;Papadopoulos, 2017).…”

Os desafios da sociedade não têm fronteiras: impacto da pesquisa acadêmica interdisciplinar em polí­ticas públicas

“…A avaliação foi implementada no governo de Margaret Thatcher para colocar em prática um sistema em que a qualidade da pesquisa era recompensada e incentivada, sendo o financiamento de pesquisa vinculado à qualidade de seus resultados. A partir dessa iniciativa, novas formas de avaliação de qualidade da pesquisa acadêmica espalharamse rapidamente pelo mundo (Dill, 2003;Johnston & Reeves, 2018).…”