2001
DOI: 10.1109/36.927429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of acoustic-to-seismic coupling to detect buried antitank landmines

Abstract: When an acoustic wave strikes the ground surface, energy is coupled into the motion of the fluid/solid frame comprising the ground. This phenomenon is termed acoustic-to-seismic (A/S) coupling. In the ground, the Biot Type II or Biot slow waves travel with a speed well below the speed of sound in air. The porous nature of the ground causes the entering acoustic wave to bend toward the normal and the acoustic wave propagates downward into the ground. When an object is buried a few cm below the ground surface, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It takes significant time and resources to clear out regions contaminated by mines, so it is important to develop efficient detection and localization systems to find the mines. Existing systems are usually based on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) sensing, but recent efforts [1]- [6] have employed seismic waves to detect subsurface targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It takes significant time and resources to clear out regions contaminated by mines, so it is important to develop efficient detection and localization systems to find the mines. Existing systems are usually based on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) sensing, but recent efforts [1]- [6] have employed seismic waves to detect subsurface targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on the seismic detection of landmines can be divided into two categories: methods that measure the seismic wave field directly above a mine and those that only measure a portion of the wave field at a stand-off distance [4], [5]. The first technique has been shown to be relatively resistant to clutter due to the strong resonant response directly above the mine; however, this method is quite time consuming due to the large number of measurements needed to ensure that some of the measurement points are above the mine [3], [6], [7]. Efforts to speed up these techniques using large arrays of sensors are ongoing [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking in mind this limitation new techniques are appearing to detect the plastic landmines. Several techniques have been proposed for mine detection, such as acoustic techniques, Sabatier & Xiang (2001); X-rays techniques, Lockwood et al (1997); biosensors, Larsson & Abrahamsson (1993); ion mobility spectrometers, Jankowski et al (1992); nuclear quadrupole resonance, Englelbeen (1998); neutron analysis, Bach et al (1996); ground penetrating radar (GPR) and infrared thermography (IRT), López et al (2009); Thanh et al (2009;2007;. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages, for a more detailed description of theses techniques see Furuta & Ishikawa (2009); Gros & Bruschini (1998); López (2003); Robledoa et al (2009);Siegel (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through computer stereo vision or time-of-flight imaging (Hussman et al 2008), and even exceed human capabilities via e.g. ground penetrating radar (Annan 2009) or acoustic waves (Sabatier and Xiang 2001). Through such techniques, it is plausible that sub-surface object identification, automatic obstacle-avoidance or guidance during stump removal can be enabled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%