1950
DOI: 10.1177/001872675000300401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Behavioral Contagion in Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with both theory and empirical research on social contagion (Crandall, 1988;Levy et al, 1993;Polansky et al, 1950;Redl, 1949;Wheeler, 1966;Wheeler et al, 1966 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with both theory and empirical research on social contagion (Crandall, 1988;Levy et al, 1993;Polansky et al, 1950;Redl, 1949;Wheeler, 1966;Wheeler et al, 1966 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The observing manager then begins to use similar tactics with his or her subordinates in order to increase their performance and earn the manager a promotion. Contagion theories suggest that both external and internal factors trigger the spread of behavior among individuals (Polansky, Lippitt, & Redl, 1950;Wheeler, Smith, & Murphy, 1964). In social contagion, the imitating manager would be motivated by an internal factor, such as low justice perceptions or work frustration, and also by an external factor, such as observing an imitator's abusive behavior which goes unpunished or earning rewards for mistreating subordinates.…”
Section: What Is Social Contagion?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations