An Investigation of Neural Stimulation Efficiency With Gaussian Waveforms

Abstract

An Investigation of Neural Stimulation Efficiency With Gaussian Waveformshttp://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/12166/ Article LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Abstract-Objective:Previous computational studies predict that Gaussian shaped waveforms use the least energy to activate nerves. The primary goal of this study was to examine the claimed potential of up to 60% energy savings with these waveforms over a range of phase widths (50-200µs) in an animal model. Methods: The common peroneal nerve of anaesthetized rats was stimulated via monopolar and bipolar electrodes with single stimuli. The isometric peak twitch force of the extensor digitorum longus muscle was recorded to indicate the extent of neural activation. The energy consumption, charge injection and maximum instantaneous power values required to reach 50% neural activation were compared between Gaussian pulses and standard rectangular stimuli. Results: Energy savings in the 50-200µs range of phase widths did not exceed 17% and were accompanied by significant increases in maximum instantaneous power of 110-200%. Charge efficiency was found to be increased over the whole range of tested phase widths with Gaussian compared to rectangular pulses and reached up to 55% at 1ms phase width. Conclusion: These findings challenge the claims of up to 60% energy savings with Gaussian like stimulation waveforms. The moderate energy savings achieved with the novel waveform are accompanied with considerable increases in maximal instantaneous power. Larger power sources would therefore be required, and this opposes the trend for implant miniaturization. Significance: This is the first study to comprehensively investigate stimulation efficiency of Gaussian waveforms. It sheds new light on the practical potential of such stimulation waveforms.

AI-Controlled Closed-Loop Electrical Stimulation Implants: A Feasibility Study

“…Although the maximal feasible pulse rate depends on safety considerations [14,15], the fatigue resistance of the stimulation target structure is more likely to be the limiting factor. Even with the low pulse rate of one stimulation every 3 seconds that we used in the terminal rat electrophysiology experiments to minimize neuromuscular fatigue [16,17], a 200-pulse calibration phase would only require 10 minutes.…”

“…Experiments were conducted in 11 adult Wistar rats under adherence to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and approval by the Home Office under the project licence (PPL 40/3743) and are described in detail in [16,17]. This study was approved by the Liverpool John Moores University Research Ethics Committee.…”

A 7.6-ns Delay Subthreshold Level-Shifter Leveraging a Composite Transistor and a Voltage-Controlled Current Source

“…The current flows in the TnM only during a limited time interval within the PD, provides the current I with a Gaussian waveform (Fig. 7), which is an energy-optimal waveform [44]- [45]. The figure also shows VA, which is controlled by the feedback network, increasing smoothly.…”

Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

“…However, the highly nonlinear neural response has been a challenge that classic optimization methods have difficulties dealing with. Many studies simply evaluate and compare candidate waveforms defined a priori based on heuristics, such as (multiphasic) rectangular, triangular, rising and falling ramp or exponential, Gaussian, and sinusoidal pulse shapes [72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. Classic optimization methods, such as gradient decent [79] or calculus of variations and the related principle of least action [80][81][82], have only been applied to single-or two-compartment neuron and straight axon models.…”