2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-490x.2003.tb00164.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Nonacademic Admission Criteria for Doctoral‐Level Counselor Education and Similar Professional Programs

Abstract: A survey investigating nonacademic admission criteria was mailed to 39 doctoral programs accredited by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. Twenty‐five returned surveys reflected that letters of recommendation, goal statements, individual interviews, and work experiences were most frequently used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hoskins and Goldberg (2005) noted that students who experience an academic mismatch between their educational goals and their CES doctoral program will, in some cases, discontinue doctoral pursuit, or relocate to different CES programs. By eliciting information about students' motivations to pursue a CES degree by using professional goal statements in the doctoral program application process (Nelson, Canada, & Lancaster, 2003), counselor educators can assess for academic match and use this information to inform decisions about program admissions. Through talking with students about the motivations that have influenced their decisions to begin doctoral work in CES, Counselor Educators can help them find programs that will match their needs.…”
Section: Implications For Cesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoskins and Goldberg (2005) noted that students who experience an academic mismatch between their educational goals and their CES doctoral program will, in some cases, discontinue doctoral pursuit, or relocate to different CES programs. By eliciting information about students' motivations to pursue a CES degree by using professional goal statements in the doctoral program application process (Nelson, Canada, & Lancaster, 2003), counselor educators can assess for academic match and use this information to inform decisions about program admissions. Through talking with students about the motivations that have influenced their decisions to begin doctoral work in CES, Counselor Educators can help them find programs that will match their needs.…”
Section: Implications For Cesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, personal interviews have been used by a majority of doctoral-and master's-level counselor education programs in countries such as the United States and Canada (e.g., Childers & Rye, 1987;Hosford, Johnson, & Atkinson, 1984;Leverett-Main, 2004;Nelson, Canada, & Lancaster, 2003, Redfering & Biasco, 1976Rem, Oren, & Childrey, 1987;Rickard & Clements, 1986). A general purpose has been to include ''appropriateness for the profession'' (Nelson et al, 2003, p. 3) as one of the admission criteria (see, for example, the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs [CACREP], 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in the field of counseling, there has been an increased emphasis on counselor education program admission criteria (Bradey & Post, 1991;Markert & Monke, 1990;Nelson, Canada, & Lancaster, 2003), methods used to screen counseling program applicants (Bradey & Post, 1991;Nagpal & Ritchie, 2002;Perusse, Goodnough, & Noel, 2001), and characteristics of and methods for addressing students with impairments (Bradey & Post, 1991;Forrest, Elman, Gizara, & Vacha-Haase, 1999;Gaubatz & Vera, 2002). One relatively new method for screening program applicants and for identifying students who may be unsuitable for work as a counselor, the criminal background check.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%