An investigation of perceptions of social equity and price acceptability judgments for campers in the U.S. national forest

Park, Joungkoo; Ellis, Gary D.; Kim, Seongseop; Prideaux, Bruce

doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.012

Cited by 40 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The existing international scholarship on camping and caravanning is dominated by demand-side investigations variously of the demographics, motivations and satisfaction of participants with choices of particular camp sites (Stephens et al, 1989;Prideaux & McClymont, 2006;Van Heerden, 2010b;Park et al, 2010;O'Neill et al, 2011;Østby, 2013, Brooker & Joppe, 2014Brochardo & Pereira, 2017;Mikulić et al, 2017;Van Heerden, 2020). Demographically whilst camping is viewed as appealing to all age cohorts (with the exception of 18-24 years) it is seen as particularly popular with young families (Brooker & Joppe, 2013;Mikkelsen & Blichfeldt, 2015).…”

Section: Contemporary Research Themes Demand-side Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Camping Tourism: A Review of Recent International Scholarship

Rogerson¹,

Rogerson²

2020

GTG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most under-researched facets of lodging is that which surrounds the niche of camping tourism. This review article traces trends and recent developments shaping international research on camping tourism. The analysis begins with a discussion of definitional and conceptual issues. Thereafter, the international spread of camping tourism as well as its local impacts for destinations is interrogated. The marginal role of camping in overall tourism studies scholarship is isolated. Key themes of concern in recent research are, inter alia, demand-side considerations; supply-side research; a distinctive scholarship on holiday camps and low-budget tourism; and, new innovations and management challenges which are associated with the changing character of camping tourism in many parts of the world. Knowledge gaps are identified in literature both in terms of the geography and thematic foci of camping tourism literature. Among knowledge gaps are the supply-side evolution of camping tourism, the role of private sector entrepreneurs, local development impacts and planning, and innovative management interventions for the sustainable development of camping tourism.

show abstract

Section: Contemporary Research Themes Demand-side Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Camping Tourism: A Review of Recent International Scholarship

Rogerson¹,

Rogerson²

2020

GTG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Além disso, a satisfação do consumidor diminui quando há percepção de injustiça nos preços. As empresas podem perder seus clientes, visto que os consumidores modificam seu comportamento sobre intenção de compra e recompra futura (Martínez et al, 2013;Murphy & Pritchard, 1997;Monroe & Xia, 2005;Chung;Petrick, 2015;Park et al, 2010;Nicolau, 2013). Estudos indicam ainda que a percepção de injustiça pode levar a comportamentos potencialmente destrutivos, como boca a boca negativo, excesso de reclamações, boicotes e até ações judiciais (Mayer e Avila, 2014).…”

Section: Percepção De Justiça Em Preçosunclassified

“…Percepções de injustiça em preços podem levar a reações sociais desfavoráveis a comportamentos potencialmente destrutivos por parte dos consumidores (Martínez et al, 2013;Murphy & Pritchard, 1997;Monroe, Xia, 2005;Chung;Petrick, 2015;Park et al, 2010;Nicolau, 2013;Mayer & Avila, 2014). No presente estudo, os entrevistados relataram diferentes tipos de comportamento usados para lidar com preços inaceitáveis ou injustos.…”

Section: Comportamentos Derivados Dos Julgamentos De Injustiçaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dynamic pricing and price fairness perceptions: a study of the use of the Uber app in travels

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A precificação dinâmica é considerada um método eficiente na gestão de preços e tem sido adotada por hotéis e companhias aéreas há décadas. Mais recentemente, o aplicativo de mobilidade urbana Uber, presente em mais de 600 países, introduziu a precificação dinâmica em tempo real que busca ajustar a oferta à demanda pelo serviço. Embora a literatura destaque os benefícios dos preços dinâmicos, economistas comportamentais argumentam que essas variações de preços podem ser consideradas injustas. Assim, os objetivos desse estudo são: examinar como consumidores e turistas julgam a justiça dos preços praticados pela Uber; investigar as percepções relacionadas à precificação dinâmica e à supressão da informação sobre o multiplicador da tarifa na solicitação do serviço; e examinar quais são os comportamentos derivados de julgamentos de injustiça dos preços. Trata-se de uma abordagem qualitativa e exploratória cujo método é o grupo focal. Os principais resultados indicam que o julgamento dos preços varia com o contexto e com a avalições dos benefícios do serviço; que a precificação dinâmica é considerada aceitável, mas que, em certas condições, pode desencadear sentimentos de injustiça e emoções negativas em uma parcela considerável de consumidores; e que turistas adotam estratégias comportamentais para minimizar a incerteza dos preços dinâmicos.

show abstract

“…The measurement of fairness perception is not simple as it is a subjective, complex, vague and ambiguous construct (Azar and Darvishi, 2011). Persons usually determine whether they have been treated fairly first by examining the ratio of their inputs relevant to their outcomes and then by comparing this ratio to the inputs-to-outcomes ratio of a referent other (Park et al, 2010); furthermore, their own thoughts, past experiences and personal modes of thinking will also affect the final perception of fairness. It may be impossible to acquire the individual fairness by performing social investigations for a large number of consumers.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Limited public resources allocation model based on social fairness using an extended VIKOR method

Jiang

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article information:To cite this document: Wenqi Jiang, (2016) "Limited public resources allocation model based on social fairness using an extended VIKOR method", Kybernetes, Vol. 45 Issue: 7, pp.998-1012, https For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.*Related content and download information correct at time of download. Limited public resources allocation model based on social fairness using an extended VIKOR method Wenqi JiangNanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China Abstract Purpose -Different from manufacturing resources allocation problems, the prices and amounts of limited public service resources could not be changed with the consumers' requirements and social fairness is the most important objective for improving allocation efficiency. To measure social fairness reasonably, the purpose of this paper is fourfold: first, divide social fairness into longitudinal comparative fairness and crosswise comparative fairness, therefore providing their calculation formula and describing the comprehensive fair degree by using the interval numbers. Second, the comparison regulations of interval numbers are given and the corresponding features are also described. Third, an extension of VIKOR method is put forward for evaluating social fairness of different allocation alternatives with interval numbers. Finally, a numerical example illustrates the proposed method and clarifies the main results developed in the paper. Design/methodology/approach -In this paper, the author depicts the social fair degree as an interval number, and thus proposes the comparison method between any two interval numbers. Based on the basis procedure of the VIKOR method, the paper proposes an extension of the fuzzy VIKOR method with the interval numbers to rank and select the compromise allocation alternatives. Finally, a numerical example illustrates the practicability of the proposed method.Findings -The comparison of interval numbers is very important when the author evaluates the decision alternatives. Through analyzing the present comparison methods, the paper proposes the simple method of comparing the interval numbers, which can obtain the same results with the above two methods. The fuzzy VIKOR method, a popular multi-...

show abstract

An investigation of perceptions of social equity and price acceptability judgments for campers in the U.S. national forest

Cited by 40 publications

References 62 publications

Camping Tourism: A Review of Recent International Scholarship

Camping Tourism: A Review of Recent International Scholarship

Dynamic pricing and price fairness perceptions: a study of the use of the Uber app in travels

Limited public resources allocation model based on social fairness using an extended VIKOR method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About