1990
DOI: 10.21236/ada231244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Si-SiO2 Interface Charges in Thermally Oxidized (100), (110), (111), (511) Silicon

Abstract: Ba. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING 8 b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If applicable)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With recent requirements for MOSFET gate oxide of the order of 10 nm, it is necessary to control the initial stage of Si oxidation which strongly depends on both the -silicon surface orientation (1-4) and the surface preparation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Of particular importance are: the density of silicon atoms on different crystallographic planes (3,4); interface trapped charge where charges may be trapped in surface electronic states (10,11); refractive index…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With recent requirements for MOSFET gate oxide of the order of 10 nm, it is necessary to control the initial stage of Si oxidation which strongly depends on both the -silicon surface orientation (1-4) and the surface preparation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Of particular importance are: the density of silicon atoms on different crystallographic planes (3,4); interface trapped charge where charges may be trapped in surface electronic states (10,11); refractive index…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thickness gap, similar to the observation by Angermann et al [55] who observed a skewing toward the conduction band when p-type Si substrates are utilized. As compared to other thermally grown silicon oxides [56][57][58][59] which exhibited significantly lower D it values ($1-2 orders), their film thickness was however also significantly higher at $50-240 nm, making it inappropriate for tunnel layer applications. On the other hand, the wet-SiO x and ozone-SiO x tunnel oxides reported in Refs.…”
Section: Tunnel Oxidementioning
confidence: 88%