36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of tailored upstream heating for sonic boom and drag reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction time t is counted from the moment when the shock and the interface first meet each other. This system of equations (16)(17)(18)(19), together with the equations (2-10) have been used to simulate the data for the vorticity generation. Figs.…”
Section: C Power-law Density Distribution Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction time t is counted from the moment when the shock and the interface first meet each other. This system of equations (16)(17)(18)(19), together with the equations (2-10) have been used to simulate the data for the vorticity generation. Figs.…”
Section: C Power-law Density Distribution Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex nature and a number of co-processes often involved in this type of the interaction can be seen from the images of the initially simply structured planar, bow, or oblique shock evolving into a complicated system of distorted and secondary shocks with flow separation regions and formation of vortices [12]. Among the most remarkable changes are: the shock wave acceleration and its strong front distortion increasing with time followed with remarkable weakening of the shock until it appears less and less identifiable [12][13][14][15]; motion of the shock away from the body in the presence of heating [16]; substantial changes in the gas/plasma parameter distribution behind the shock, particularly sharp reduction of pressure [17]; remarkable, up to 40% reduction in the wave drag experienced by a body when the plasma is created upstream [18,19]; the time-delays in the effects on the flow relative to the discharge on-off times and a finite pressure rise time [7]; and a vortex system formation in the flow behind the shock often followed with strong distortion or collapse of the plasma region [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate broad possibilities to modify and control the SW front. [1][2][3] Any capability to modify the structure of a SW can reduce its strength and significantly decrease the shock induced drag, thus mitigating the effects of shocks in supersonic flight, heating problems during re-entry into the atmosphere, and reducing the effects of sonic booms. The changes in the SW front, such as its curvature, can possibly affect the structure of the detonation wave by affecting the ignition conditions through the dependence on the detonation speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies, both computational and experimental have shown the efficacy of upstream energy deposition for shock wave modification (and resulting drag reduction) on blunt bodies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) as well as potential drag reductions for forward-facing upstream injection (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) . Forward facing injection from blunt bodies in high-speed flows when coupled with upstream deposition of energy has recently been shown to result in large decreases in overall drag and heat transfer (32) .…”
Section: Upstream Energy Deposition and Upstream-directed Fluid Injecmentioning
confidence: 99%