2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presentation of content in text form, graphical displays and audios have been suggested for health websites in different studies [2,55]. Colours should be used sparingly according to the age group [56] or to address the colour vision deficiency [57].…”
Section: Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presentation of content in text form, graphical displays and audios have been suggested for health websites in different studies [2,55]. Colours should be used sparingly according to the age group [56] or to address the colour vision deficiency [57].…”
Section: Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, there has been published a large number of studies scrutinizing the quality of online information related to most if not any known disease or medical condition. Various authors conclude that the Internet is not a reliable source of information and does not accurately inform patients about coronary heart disease [28], cardiac murmurs [29], varicose veins and the treatment options [30], gastric cancer [31], breast cancer [32,33], head and neck cancers [34], oral cancer [35], prostate cancer [36], urological oncology [37], hemangiomas [38], menopause [39], diabetes mellitus [40,41], parathyroid disease [42], healthy nutrition [43,44], vitamin B12 [45], depression [46], epilepsy [47] rheumatological conditions [48], osteoporosis [49], first aid for burns [50,51], first aid in choking [52], cervical and lumbar disc herniation [53,54], scoliosis [55], vascular and other surgical operations [56,57], influenza [58], child fever [59], coeliac disease [60]. The concerns regarding the poor quality and many times even misguided health-related information available on the Internet have increased with the advent of Web 2.0 and its equivalents in the medical field (health blogs, health-oriented social media groups, YouTube), namely Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0, which are characterized, among other traits, by an unprecedented increase in user-provided content [61][62][63].…”
Section: The Internet As a Source Of Health-related Information The Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Overall, credibility and accuracy of information remains an issue due to high volume of content and varied sources of information on the Internet. 18,33,35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,45,46 However, there is limited evidence regarding Internet communication of environmental risks causing breast cancer. Specific to environmental factors related to breast cancer risk, research has focused either on certain environmental factors, effects of visual presentation in communication of health risk, or information available in the news media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%