2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl073755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation on slowness‐weighted CCP stacking and its application to receiver function imaging

Abstract: Common conversion point (CCP) stacking of receiver functions is a widely used technique to image velocity discontinuities in the mantle. The CCP imaging technique assumes that receiver functions are composed solely of P to S conversions at velocity boundaries, whose depths can be mapped out through their arrival times. The multiple reflections at shallow boundaries with large velocity contrasts, such as the base of unconsolidated sediments and the Moho, can lead to artificial structures in the CCP images. We d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the SWCCP stacking approach (Guan & Niu, 2017), we successfully removed most of the multiples that appeared at the MTZ depths in the CCP stacked profiles. The real seismic discontinuities have been thus clearly identified (Figures 4c and 4d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the SWCCP stacking approach (Guan & Niu, 2017), we successfully removed most of the multiples that appeared at the MTZ depths in the CCP stacked profiles. The real seismic discontinuities have been thus clearly identified (Figures 4c and 4d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D660 is relatively easier to pick but it shows clearly different depth variations along two profiles. To reduce the influence of the multiples in our CCP profiles, we performed the slowness weighted CCP (SWCCP) stacking method (Guan & Niu, 2017). A slowness‐based factor is designed to weight RF amplitudes along the CCP profile mainly according to the difference between the relative slowness of the slant‐stacked amplitude and the theoretical slowness of the direct Ps conversion (e.g., Figure 3c) (see Text in supporting information for more details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These existing methods have been applied in many different cases, but their applications also have many restrictions. Most of these methods are too sensitive to noise (Guan & Niu, ; Mousavi & Langston, , , ; Mousavi et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note also that various approaches have been proposed to filter out the different contributions from the different modes directly on the raw data/RFs (e.g. Guan & Niu 2017;Ainiwaer & Gurrola 2017).…”
Section: Common Reflection Point Stacking For Vertical Autocorrelationsmentioning
confidence: 99%