2018 Latin American Robotic Symposium, 2018 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) and 2018 Workshop on Robotics in Education (W 2018
DOI: 10.1109/lars/sbr/wre.2018.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An IoT Protocol Evaluation in a Smart Factory Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is mainly applicable to embedded devices and microcontroller-based devices. Bezerra et al 2 tested and evaluated that MQTT is a better and more suitable IoT protocol in smart factory environment. Under the same conditions, MQTT has smaller message packets and a simpler structure, so it is faster to transmit messages.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly applicable to embedded devices and microcontroller-based devices. Bezerra et al 2 tested and evaluated that MQTT is a better and more suitable IoT protocol in smart factory environment. Under the same conditions, MQTT has smaller message packets and a simpler structure, so it is faster to transmit messages.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] the authors made a comparison between the AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) and MQTT protocols, in the context of a smart factory environment, with ROS also being used in some applications that required a more complex and heterogeneous environment.…”
Section: Mqtt Mqtt-sn Coapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main requirements for these types of protocols are defined in the Internet information document RFC 2779 ("Instant Messaging/Presence Protocol Requirements"). This paper considers two main messaging protocols, XMPP and AMQP (Bezerra et al, 2018), and two software solutions that use these protocols, SPADE and RabbitMQ, respectively.…”
Section: Software Agent Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%