Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1994.751839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An LMI approach to peak-to-peak gain minimisation: filtering and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, referring to Schweppe' s work, within the context of L ¥ induced signals, the L 1 norm bound (41) also appears without proof in Nagpal et al (1994) and Sznaier et al (1995).…”
Section: Combined H 2 /L 1 ® Xed-order Dynamic Compensation: Decentramentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, referring to Schweppe' s work, within the context of L ¥ induced signals, the L 1 norm bound (41) also appears without proof in Nagpal et al (1994) and Sznaier et al (1995).…”
Section: Combined H 2 /L 1 ® Xed-order Dynamic Compensation: Decentramentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, as in the pure discrete-time z 1 case (Dahleh and Pearson 1987a, McDonald and Pearson 1991, Sta ans 1991, Dahleh and Diaz-Bobillo 1995 the resulting mixed H 2 / z 1 controller order could be arbitrarily high. In recent research Sznaier et al (1995) posed a constrained (non-optimal) mixed H 2 bound/L 1 bound control problem using the linear matrix inequality feasibility framework developed by Nagpal et al (1994). However, since the approach of Sznaier et al (1995) is based on a matrix inequality feasibility problem, there are no optimality guarantees of the resulting mixed-norm H 2 bound/L 1 bound controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations