2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observational Study of Usability in Collaborative Tangible Interfaces for Complex Planning Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As well, real-time design feedback (such as zoning violation or exceeding limits) helped participants in the sense-making and learning process. At last, this research suggested that TUIs such as CS are superior to traditional public participation for urban planning in terms of rapid prototyping and feedback, collaboration, and decision-making process [11] [12].…”
Section: Cityscope As a Community Engagement Platform: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As well, real-time design feedback (such as zoning violation or exceeding limits) helped participants in the sense-making and learning process. At last, this research suggested that TUIs such as CS are superior to traditional public participation for urban planning in terms of rapid prototyping and feedback, collaboration, and decision-making process [11] [12].…”
Section: Cityscope As a Community Engagement Platform: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Para projetar um sistema de interface tangível, que apoia a colaboração e facilita a tomada de decisões entre as partes interessadas de diferentes origens, é essencial testar a usabilidade de tal sistema (ALRASHED;. Sendo assim, pode-se desenvolver um sistema habilitado com uma interface sofisticada, mas não se pode garantir sua usabilidade sem assimilar percepções e experiências dos usuários em seu design.…”
Section: Usabilidade Do Sistemaunclassified
“…The neighborhood and street scales were represented with CityScope, a platform that utilizes physical models (built from LEGO bricks) and projections of static and dynamic information. CityScope has been shown to encourage collaboration and communication among stakeholders ( 23 ). CityScope’s BRT workshop versions allowed users to examine how different corridor types might perform in a neighborhood, or how different street elements (such as bus stop types or bike lanes in lieu of parking) might affect the streetscape and corridor performance.…”
Section: Research Objectives and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%