2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An olfactory biconditional discrimination in the mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in audition (Purwins et al, 2008); vision (Noudoost et al, 2005); audition and vision (Kubovy and Van Valkenburg, 2001); gustation and olfaction (Batson et al, 2008)], according which stimulus compounds (mixtures) are represented by their components and an additional configural element that represents the conjunction of those stimuli, is consistent with blending process in odour mixture. The present study confirms for rabbit pups that the blending effect of the AB mixture is incomplete (Dreumont-Boudreau et al, 2006), and thus that the configural perception of AB is weak (Kay et al, 2005), as was previously hypothesized (Coureaud et al, 2008). In other words, when smelt, the AB mixture would give rise to the perception of the odour of the components as well as the additional odour of the configuration related to the mixture.…”
Section: G Coureaud and Otherssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in audition (Purwins et al, 2008); vision (Noudoost et al, 2005); audition and vision (Kubovy and Van Valkenburg, 2001); gustation and olfaction (Batson et al, 2008)], according which stimulus compounds (mixtures) are represented by their components and an additional configural element that represents the conjunction of those stimuli, is consistent with blending process in odour mixture. The present study confirms for rabbit pups that the blending effect of the AB mixture is incomplete (Dreumont-Boudreau et al, 2006), and thus that the configural perception of AB is weak (Kay et al, 2005), as was previously hypothesized (Coureaud et al, 2008). In other words, when smelt, the AB mixture would give rise to the perception of the odour of the components as well as the additional odour of the configuration related to the mixture.…”
Section: G Coureaud and Otherssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Apart from these phenomena linked to experience, the processing of odorants in mixtures may also result from perceptual interactions that probably occur during olfactory information processing. Thus, overshadowing or odour blending have been suggested to happen both in animals and humans Dreumont-Boudreau et al, 2006). Some researches have focused on the behavioural consequences of these perceptual interactions of odours, with the aim of improving the understanding of odour-guided behaviour in the natural environment (Derby et al, 1996;Valentincic et al, 2000;Wiltrout et al, 2003;Kay et al, 2005;Deisig et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human adults, an AB mixture composed of ethyl isobutyrate (A) and ethyl maltol (B), smelling like strawberry and caramel, respectively, induces the configural perception of 'pineapple' (Le Barkat et al, 2011). Such a mixture has been called a blending mixture (Dreumont-Boudreau et al, 2006;Le Berre et al, 2008;Le Berre et al, 2010;Barkat et al, 2011). Recently, configural perception of the same AB mixture has also been reported in newborn rabbits: after a single conditioning to AB, pups respond to odorants A and B, showing abilities to extract the odour of each element during conditioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olfactory cues are detectable over large temporal and spatial scales (11) and initiate search behavior in a wide variety of predators (12). Mammalian predators live in a rich olfactory world, able to detect and recognize immense numbers of odors and distinguish minute differences in complex mixtures (13,14). Such capabilities should hinder efficient foraging unless superfluous olfactory information can be quickly disregarded (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%