2020
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch

Abstract: Online experimental platforms can be used as an alternative to, or complement, lab-based research. However, when conducting auditory experiments via online methods, the researcher has limited control over the participants’ listening environment. We offer a new method to probe one aspect of that environment, headphone use. Headphones not only provide better control of sound presentation but can also “shield” the listener from background noise. Here we present a rapid (< 3 min) headphone screening test based … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we asked participants to perform the experiment in a quiet environment and to avoid distractions, Internet testing made it difficult to control for external noise or potential interruptions, which remain a major challenge for online testing in general, and for auditory research in particular. Moreover, we did not include a task to ensure that participants used headphones (Milne et al, 2020;Woods et al, 2017). Although we strongly recommended that they used them throughout the experiment, it was not possible to verify whether they did or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we asked participants to perform the experiment in a quiet environment and to avoid distractions, Internet testing made it difficult to control for external noise or potential interruptions, which remain a major challenge for online testing in general, and for auditory research in particular. Moreover, we did not include a task to ensure that participants used headphones (Milne et al, 2020;Woods et al, 2017). Although we strongly recommended that they used them throughout the experiment, it was not possible to verify whether they did or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these benefits, online testing needs specific exclusion criteria, careful experimental designs, and appropriate motivational strategies (e.g., feedback) to ensure that participants complete all of the tasks and to maximize control (e.g., Gosling et al, 2004). Auditory research, and temporally based experimental tasks in general, can be particularly challenging, because compared to the laboratory, online testing occurs in contexts that are more variable and uncontrolled in terms of noise, technical aspects of stimulus presentation, and potential interruptions (e.g., Milne et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research could control for this variability by an in-depth characterization of exposure conditions such as ambient sounds, headphone type, lighting, and psychosomatic factors during the introductory session with the participant. Another complementary way would be to incorporate automated controls such as for example headphone screening tests (Woods et al, 2017;Milne et al, 2020), a gold standard (Nelson and Allen, 2019) and background level recordings (Murphy and King, 2016). In future research, we plan to use a portable, custom-made sensor system that we developed to automatically track breathing cycles which allows to free the cognitive resources required to manually indicate breathing onsets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Since free-field interference disrupts this interaural phase offset, screening tasks based on Huggins' pitch are highly selective for participants who are using headphones. 30 On each trial, three binaural noise stimuli were presented sequentially, one of which contained a Huggins' pitch stimulus. Participants made a 3AFC judgment about which interval contained the "hidden tone.…”
Section: Screening and Pre-experiments Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%