2017 Seventeenth International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icter.2017.8257815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online traffic sign recognition system for intelligent driver assistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soni et al [ 24 ] processed the Chinese traffic sign dataset through SVM, trained on the HOG or LBP after Principal Component Analysis (PCA), reaching an accuracy of 84.44%. A similar setup was used by Manisha and Liyanage [ 21 ], who achieved 98.6% accuracy on vehicles moving at 40–45 km/h. Moreover, Matoš et al [ 22 ] used an SVM trained on HOG features and achieved recognition of 93.75% accuracy on the GTSRB dataset.…”
Section: Background On Traffic Sign Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soni et al [ 24 ] processed the Chinese traffic sign dataset through SVM, trained on the HOG or LBP after Principal Component Analysis (PCA), reaching an accuracy of 84.44%. A similar setup was used by Manisha and Liyanage [ 21 ], who achieved 98.6% accuracy on vehicles moving at 40–45 km/h. Moreover, Matoš et al [ 22 ] used an SVM trained on HOG features and achieved recognition of 93.75% accuracy on the GTSRB dataset.…”
Section: Background On Traffic Sign Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, deep learning algorithms, such as AlexNet, googLeNet [ 20 ] can directly process images coming from sensors and classify them according to internal representation learning processes, which are orchestrated through multiple convolutional and fully connected layers. Throughout the years, many studies tackled TSR [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] using different feature descriptors and ML-based classifiers. Different combinations of such classifiers and features have been proven to generate heterogeneous classification scores [ 15 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] motivating the need for comparisons to discover the optimal classifier for a given TSR problem [ 3 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, researchers and practitioners used nondeep ML classifiers for single-frame TSR [30], [31], [32]. Supervised classifiers such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs, [33]), Decision Trees (and ensembles, [34], [35]) or Nearest Neighbors (KNN, [36]) cannot directly process frames.…”
Section: A Traffic Sign Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the GTSDB is used in [6][7][8][9]. On the other hand, researches in [10][11][12] used the MTSD dataset for the implementation of the TSR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%