2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology-Based Model for ITIL Process Assessment Using TIPA for ITIL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontology to describe ITIL was proposed here (Almeida et al, 2018). Three activities are carried out simultaneously throughout the life cycle of the ontology, each of which has an intra-dependency relationship: activities related to management, growth, and support.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ontology to describe ITIL was proposed here (Almeida et al, 2018). Three activities are carried out simultaneously throughout the life cycle of the ontology, each of which has an intra-dependency relationship: activities related to management, growth, and support.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2016) (Verlaine et al, 2014) (Almeida et al, 2018)(Pedersen et al, 2010) (Bahsani et al, 2011) (Karkošková & Feuerlicht, 2014) (McCarthy et al, 2015) 03 ITIL usage in other firms (Binders & Romanovs, 2014) (Himi et al, 2011) (Andry & Christianto, 2018) (Mohammed, 2018) (Ramakrishnan, 2014) (Esteves & Alves, 2013) (Page et al, 2021) (Tanovic et al, 2014) (Orakzai, al., 2020) (Serrano et al, 2021) (Koutsoumpos & Marinelarena, 2013) (Raj & Sinha, 2015)(Sahid et al, 2018) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [73], three main aspects should be considered to evaluate an ontology. These aspects are conciseness, completeness and consistency.…”
Section: Assessment Of Devops Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the guidelines provided in References 37 and 47, a study is conducted to evaluate OntoSuSD empirically from the different quality criteria aspects: accuracy, adaptability, clarity, completeness, conciseness, consistency, applicability, and purpose. The quality criteria aspects includes the three C's (completeness, conciseness, and consistency) suggested by Almeida et al 73 The accuracy determines that the concepts, properties, property restrictions, and axioms are defined correctly in relation to the knowledge in the domain and the ontology returns correct answers to the CQs. The adaptability determines the asserted knowledge and defined contents in the ontology can be reused in domain-specific ontologies and the ontology can be used in real-world applications.…”
Section: Human-centric Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%