An open-source development based on photogrammetry for a real-time IORT treatment planning system

Lozares-Cordero, Sergio; Bermejo-Barbanoj, Carlos; Badías-Herbera, Alberto; Ibáñez-Carreras, Reyes; Ligorred-Padilla, Luis; Ponce-Ortega, José Miguel; González-Pérez, Víctor; Gandía-Martínez, Almudena; Font-Gómez, José Antonio; Blas-Borroy, Olga; González-Ibáñez, David

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102622

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a recent study by Lozares‐Cordero et al., the authors validated and successfully applied their model to 15 patients with soft‐tissue sarcoma. 69 …”

Section: Iort Current Status and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraoperative radiation therapy with 50 kV x‐rays: A multi‐institutional review

Sethi,

Gros,

Brodin

et al. 2024

J Applied Clin Med Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report covers clinical implementation of a low kV intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) program with the INTRABEAM® System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Based on collective user experience from eight institutions, we discuss best methods of INTRABEAM quality assurance (QA) tests, commissioning measurements, clinical workflow, treatment planning, and potential avenues for research. The guide provides pertinent background information and clinical justification for IORT. It describes the INTRABEAM system and commissioning measurements along with a TG100 risk management analysis to ensure safety and accuracy of the IORT program. Following safety checks, dosimetry measurements are performed for verification of field flatness and symmetry, x‐ray output, and depth dose. Also discussed are dose linearity checks, beam isotropy, ion chamber measurements, calibration protocols, and in‐vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters OSLDs, and radiochromic film. Emphasis is placed on the importance of routine QA procedures (daily, monthly, and annual) performed at regular intervals for a successful IORT program. For safe and accurate dose delivery, tests of important components of IORT clinical workflow are emphasized, such as, dose prescription, pre‐treatment QA, treatment setup, safety checks, radiation surveys, and independent checks of delivered dose. Challenges associated with in‐vivo dose measurements are discussed, along with special treatment procedures and shielding requirements. The importance of treatment planning in IORT is reviewed with reference to a Monte Carlo‐based commercial treatment planning system highlighting its main features and limitations. The report concludes with suggested topics for research including CT‐based image‐guided treatment planning and improved prescription dose accuracy. We hope that this multi‐institutional report will serve as a guidance document on the clinical implementation and use of INTRABEAM IORT.

show abstract

“…In a recent study by Lozares‐Cordero et al., the authors validated and successfully applied their model to 15 patients with soft‐tissue sarcoma. 69 …”

Section: Iort Current Status and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%