2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2001.1168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data

Abstract: 2002. An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. -ICES Journal of Marine Science, 159: 293-313.Calibrated and digitized data from two or more discrete echosounder frequencies can be combined for the purpose of separating and extracting the acoustic scattering from zooplankton and fish in mixed recordings. This method is also useful for quantifying the relative contribution of each frequency to the total acoustic-backscattering when scrutinizing records in large-scale, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a mission south of Catalina Is., CA in September, 2013, there was an acoustic scattering layer at approximately 300 m. At the range this feature is sampled, the ship-based sensor had a horizontal footprint of 37-40 m while the AUV sensor, flying 4 m above the layer, had a footprint of 0.6-3.7 m. The increased resolution means one can now resolve individuals rather than simply the layer at these depths ( Figure 3). The multiple frequencies also allow for classification of the individuals into taxonomic categories and size estimates [30,31]. This system, therefore, makes it possible to examine the biology of animals in the mesopelagic zone in ways previously only possible in the upper ocean.…”
Section: Advantages Of Using An Auv As a Platform For Echosoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a mission south of Catalina Is., CA in September, 2013, there was an acoustic scattering layer at approximately 300 m. At the range this feature is sampled, the ship-based sensor had a horizontal footprint of 37-40 m while the AUV sensor, flying 4 m above the layer, had a footprint of 0.6-3.7 m. The increased resolution means one can now resolve individuals rather than simply the layer at these depths ( Figure 3). The multiple frequencies also allow for classification of the individuals into taxonomic categories and size estimates [30,31]. This system, therefore, makes it possible to examine the biology of animals in the mesopelagic zone in ways previously only possible in the upper ocean.…”
Section: Advantages Of Using An Auv As a Platform For Echosoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous data-recordings at 18, 38, 70, 120, and 200 kHz were made with a Simrad EK60 echo sounder from a transducer depth of 8 to 10 m underneath the surface down to 500 m depth, using standard acoustic settings (Korneliussen & Ona 2002) on board the MVs 'Libas' and 'Eros,' whereas 38 and 200 kHz were used onboard the MV 'Endre Dyrøy.' Acoustic data focusing on Norwegian spring spawning (NSS) herring from 2006 and 2007 were scrutinized by 2 experienced scientists with the software program Large Scale Survey System (Korneliussen et al 2009), and Nautical Area Scattering Coefficient (NASC) values enabled confident allocation to herring.…”
Section: Acoustic Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33) Therefore, the frequency response obtained by a multi-frequency echo sounder 21,34) , is theoretically reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%