1992
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1992.304.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optical Leaf Wetness Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since such sensors are developed for use on a particular material, e.g. leaf wetness sensors are designed so that the wetting and drying of the sensor is similar to the wetting and drying of the leaf (Davis and Hughes 1970;Griffioen et al 1992), they might give inaccurate results if used on a material with different surface properties. This was experienced by Bernardi et al (2006) who found that leaf wetness sensors used on glass surfaces registered longer wetness periods than their own sensor which measured directly on the glass surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since such sensors are developed for use on a particular material, e.g. leaf wetness sensors are designed so that the wetting and drying of the sensor is similar to the wetting and drying of the leaf (Davis and Hughes 1970;Griffioen et al 1992), they might give inaccurate results if used on a material with different surface properties. This was experienced by Bernardi et al (2006) who found that leaf wetness sensors used on glass surfaces registered longer wetness periods than their own sensor which measured directly on the glass surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these electrical sensors there are also mechanical types (see e.g. Wallin (1963)), beta-ray gauge sensors (Barthakur 1985;Bunnenberg and Kuhn 1977) and optical sensors (Zlochin and Seginer 2001;Griffioen et al 1992;Heusinkveld et al 2008). A review of different types of leaf wetness sensors was made by Huber (1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have suggested a relative humidity threshold as surrogate for surface wetness (Sutton et al, 1984;Wilks & Shen, 1991). Peltier cooled dew point sensors can be an inexpensive and reliable method to determine relative humidity (Bailey, 1999;Griffieon et al, 1992;Vancauwenberghe et al, 1996), although dirt deposits on the mirror surface may compromise their performance (Griffieon et al, 1992). Vincelli and Lorbeer (1988) found that relative humidity could be used to estimate missing surface wetness data; however, several other studies have shown there is a relatively poor correlation between periods of high humidity and surface wetness (Francl & Panigrahi, 1997;Lomas & Shashoua, 1970;Wallin, 1963).…”
Section: Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varios estudios sugieren umbrales de HR como estimador de la HF (Vincelli y Lorbeer, 1988;Griffieon et al, 1992;Gleason et al, 1994;Vancauwenberghe et al, 1996). En varios estudios se ha encontrado una correlación positiva entre la formación de la HF y la HR promedio (Shaw, 1973;Zangvil, 1996;Sentelhas et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified