2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3000482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimal Control Model of the Low-Carbon Supply Chain: Joint Emission Reduction, Pricing Strategies, and New Coordination Contract Design

Abstract: This paper is contended with the joint emission reduction and pricing decision problems, as well as coordination contract design issue for a class of low-carbon supply chain system. Here, the evolution of emission reduction level is characterized by a linear differential equation. Also, product demand depends on emission reduction level, promotional effort, and retail price in a separable multiplicative way. By considering an optimal control model of the low-carbon supply chain, differential game theory is use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from Table 2, the research object of supply chain green technology innovation has been limited to a single firm, such as in [12], [20], [28], [29]; between upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain, including one supplier and one manufacturer, such as in [21], [24], 27]; or between one manufacturer and one retailer, such as in [18], 19], [22], [23], [25]. [26] also studied a two-level supply chain with two competing downstream retailers .…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen from Table 2, the research object of supply chain green technology innovation has been limited to a single firm, such as in [12], [20], [28], [29]; between upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain, including one supplier and one manufacturer, such as in [21], [24], 27]; or between one manufacturer and one retailer, such as in [18], 19], [22], [23], [25]. [26] also studied a two-level supply chain with two competing downstream retailers .…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al hypothesized that product demand is related to its carbon emission reduction level and that the carbon emission reduction level is continuously evolving according to a given linear differential equation. Based on differential game theory, the joint emission reduction efforts, pricing strategies, and optimal emissions for both parties in the supply chain are obtained, the results of which show that both parties in the supply chain can achieve a win-win situation in terms of both supply chain benefits and ecology [18]. Swami and others considered the problem of the coordination of a manufacturer and a retailer in a vertical supply chain, addressing some pertinent questions in this regard, such as those related to the extent of efforts in greening operations by manufacturers or retailers, the level of cooperation between the two parties, and how to coordinate their operations in a supply chain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research studied channel structure and pricing decisions for the manufacturer and government"s subsidy policy with competing new and remanufactured products. Reference [33] contended with the joint emission reduction and pricing decision problems, as well as coordination contract design issue for a class of two-echelon low-carbon supply chain system. The dyadic supply chain system consisting of manufacturer and retailer or production inventory system were discussed, which considered the influence of consumers" low-carbon preferences on random variable demand and the impact of uncertainty on carbon emissionreduction behavior [34].…”
Section: B Carbon Emissions Allocation and Abatement Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturer M also pays attention to the emission reduction investment of supplier S and the promotion of retailer R. In the meantime, it shares a certain proportion of the costs for the upstream and downstream. The construction method refer to the References [20][21][22], [32][33][34]. Therefore, the decisions of three parties are proposed as.…”
Section: A Non-cooperative Decision-making Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guan et al [ 28 ] studied a supply chain coordination problem with a manufacturer and a retailer that have Nash bargaining fairness concerns. Yu et al [ 29 ] established the optimal control model, researched the joint emission reduction issue, and designed a new coordination contract.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%