1983
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1983.1062910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimal method for 3-D eddy currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
9

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…With this aim we introduce the following conditions as in [1,3] which assumes absence of electric charge in the dielectric domain: 12) where ǫ is the electric permittivity and g is an additional data. Notice that Γ 1…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this aim we introduce the following conditions as in [1,3] which assumes absence of electric charge in the dielectric domain: 12) where ǫ is the electric permittivity and g is an additional data. Notice that Γ 1…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time primitive of the electric field has been introduced in the literature of electrical engineering in [12] and it is usually known as modified magnetic vector potential. This potential has been used later by other authors (see, for instance, [17,18,22]) which usually couple this vector field with different unknowns in the dielectric part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emson and Simkin (1983), in the presented form, to our knowledge, a detailed mathematical analysis has not been conducted. Emson and Simkin discuss the uniqueness but take the existence of the solution for granted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods except the A -@ method shown in Table 1 cannot be applicable to a model with holes, because the magnetic scalar potential 9 cannot be defined in the region where the interlinkage of currents exists [3]. Though two kinds of modeling methods as shown in Fig.1 have been proposed[6] to overcome t h i s difficully, the method shown in Fig.l(a) is not Table 1.…”
Section: Modeling Of Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A*-R and E -Q methods are preferable from the viewpoints of the computer storage and the CPU time. A-@-S2 [2], A * -Q [3], T -Q L.41 and E -R [ 5 ] methods, have been proposed for 3-D eddy current analysis, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are not discussed systematically until now. It is important to know the most preferable (accurate and fast) method in order to solve a given problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%