50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimization Framework for Anisotropic Simplex Mesh Adaptation: Application to Aerodynamic Flows

Abstract: We apply an optimization-based framework for anisotropic simplex mesh adaptation to high-order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of two-dimensional, steady-state aerodynamic flows. The framework iterates toward a mesh that minimizes the output error for a given number of degrees of freedom by considering a continuous optimization problem of the Riemannian metric field. The adaptation procedure consists of three key steps: sampling of the anisotropic error behavior using element-wise local solves; synthesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend is more pronounced for a nonlinear problem, in which local problems require much fewer Newton iterations than the global problem. (For a typical two-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow over an isolated airfoil, the adaptation cost constitutes less than 10% of the flow solve [27]. )…”
Section: Practical Considerations For Output-based Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend is more pronounced for a nonlinear problem, in which local problems require much fewer Newton iterations than the global problem. (For a typical two-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow over an isolated airfoil, the adaptation cost constitutes less than 10% of the flow solve [27]. )…”
Section: Practical Considerations For Output-based Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] More and more physically realistic problems can be tackled through the use of such methods to obtain high accuracy solution, while reducing the need for extremely high-resolution meshes that are often required by lower-order methods. Moreover, a great deal of effort has been devoted to the versatility, robustness and efficiency of high-order flow solvers, including adaptive mesh refinement techniques, [8][9][10][11][12] solution limiting and shock capturing methods, 9,[13][14][15][16] hybrid methodologies and multigrid solution strategies. 2,[17][18][19] To this end, this paper continues on the development of high-order discretization methods, consisting of discontinuous Galerkin (DG) [1][2][3]6,18,20 and streamline/upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) [21][22][23][24] discretizations, to further expand the capability of high-order schemes in solving a wide range of viscous flow problems for complex geometries and to compare the accuracy of the high-order DG and SUPG methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also strives to increase the level of solution automation in modern CFD by taking the engineer "out of the loop" through estimation and control of errors in outputs of interest (e.g., lift, drag) [7,36]. Solution automation is accomplished through an iterative mesh optimization process, which is driven by error estimates based on the adjoints of outputs of interest [35].…”
Section: Projectxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow conditions are M ∞ = 0.3, Re c = 4000, and α = 12.5. The solution was obtained through ProjectX, using an output-adaptive automated solution strategy [35].…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation