2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
193
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
193
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative motions of the marker clusters from neighboring segments during specific reference motions (hip: ''star-arc'' 34 ; knee: flexion/extension; ankle: dorsi/plantar-flexion) were used to derive the position of joint centers 35 and joint axes 36 using an extension of a previously reported functional approach. 23 In addition, each marker was weighted to minimize the residual error of the functional joint estimation 37 and maintain the anatomical constraints of segment lengths.…”
Section: Determination Of Lower Limb Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative motions of the marker clusters from neighboring segments during specific reference motions (hip: ''star-arc'' 34 ; knee: flexion/extension; ankle: dorsi/plantar-flexion) were used to derive the position of joint centers 35 and joint axes 36 using an extension of a previously reported functional approach. 23 In addition, each marker was weighted to minimize the residual error of the functional joint estimation 37 and maintain the anatomical constraints of segment lengths.…”
Section: Determination Of Lower Limb Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In functional methods, however, the pelvic ACS does not impact on the reliability of the thigh ACS, whereas in predictive methods any errors in the definition of the pelvic ACS would propagate to the HJC, thigh ACS, and potentially reducing reliability of joint kinematics. It is currently recommended that functional calibration trials for the GSF method should be performed in a 'StarArc' movement pattern [14] with a RoM as large as possible [15,16]. The effect of number and placement of markers on the precision of the HJC estimation has been previously evaluated, although not with respect to the GSF method [17].…”
Section: Hjc Location Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of number and placement of markers on the precision of the HJC estimation has been previously evaluated, although not with respect to the GSF method [17]. The impact of the chosen functional method, movement pattern and number of markers on the accuracy of the HJC estimation has also been assessed [14,16,18,19]. To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the influence of the number of markers used on the reliability of HJC calculations.…”
Section: Hjc Location Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirkwood et al [13] compared different predictive models and reported the method of Bell et al [2] places the hip center more lateral, which would underestimate varus alignment. The use of other methods, including a functional method [3], could improve the accuracy of the HKA angle, but additional investigations will have to determine the validity of other models. Siu et al [24] described the use of a standardized procedure to control foot and hip position results in better reproducible results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%