2014
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Orientation Map for Motion Boundaries in Macaque V2

Abstract: The ability to extract the shape of moving objects is fundamental to visual perception. However, where such computations are processed in the visual system is unknown. To address this question, we used intrinsic signal optical imaging in awake monkeys to examine cortical response to perceptual contours defined by motion contrast (motion boundaries, MBs). We found that MB stimuli elicit a robust orientation response in area V2. Orientation maps derived from subtraction of orthogonal MB stimuli aligned well with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, Case 2; Fig. S11C-D, Case 1), we used 4 orientations of curvature (curved upwards, downwards, leftwards, and rightwards), each at low curvature (1-4) and high curvature (5-8). Similar to maps for straight orientation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4, Case 2; Fig. S11C-D, Case 1), we used 4 orientations of curvature (curved upwards, downwards, leftwards, and rightwards), each at low curvature (1-4) and high curvature (5-8). Similar to maps for straight orientation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, each of V1, V2, and V4 contain orientation selective domains; however, orientation selective domains are categorically different in V1, V2, and V4. Whereas those in V1 are responsive to contrast-defined orientation, those in V2 have cue-invariant orientation selectivity and represent a higher order abstraction of orientation (5, 37, 38). We suggest that orientation selective domains in V4 are at yet a higher level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those associated with thin stripes (lying lateral to thin stripes, Type I) do not receive input from layer 4B in V1, exhibit lower orientation selectivity and greater color selectivity, larger receptive size and scatter, and smaller orientation domains and maps with rapidly changing orientation preference. Thick stripes are heterogeneous and contain functional domains selective for ocular disparity (Chen et al 2008), lower and higher order contour orientation selectivity (Ramsden et al, 2001, 2014; Pan et al, 2012; Chen et al, 2014), and motion contrast borders (Lu et al 2010; Chen et al 2014). They have direct projections to MT (DeYoe & Van Essen, 1985; Shipp & Zeki, 1985, 1989; Born & Bradley, 2005) and likely indirect projections to V4 (Ninomiya et al, 2011), and thus have strong ties with both the dorsal and ventral pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%